IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › EnvManager · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

EnvManager

10Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EnvManager was named 5 times in Secrets, where Doppler led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 37

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 40

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 38

under the label threshold

In secrets · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EnvManager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Secrets management	Identity and access	0%	14 of 40	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Doppler at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EnvManager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EnvManager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	2	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider are AWS Secrets Manager, CyberArk Conjur, and EnvManager.” Llama 4 Maverick · Secrets · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“such as Doppler, Infisical, or EnvManager, which offer free or low-cost plans” Llama 4 Maverick · Secrets · budget prompt · alternative

“It has the most predictable SaaS pricing on the market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secrets · budget prompt · alternative

“The Top Choice for Budget/Control: EnvManager” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Secrets · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EnvManager, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EnvManager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HashiCorp Vault9 of 104Not in the top three

Doppler9 of 103Not in the top three

Infisical9 of 102Not in the top three

AWS Secrets Manager7 of 100Not in the top three

1Password4 of 100Not in the top three

Akeyless4 of 100Not in the top three

Bitwarden Secrets Manager3 of 101Not in the top three

Azure Key Vault3 of 100Not in the top three

Google Secret Manager3 of 100Not in the top three

CyberArk2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EnvManager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named EnvManager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

envmanager.comYour site9

blog.gitguardian.com7

guideflow.com5

cybervendorguide.com4

doppler.com3

hashicorp.com3

infisical.com3

safeguard.sh3

toolradar.com3

worldmetrics.org3

Thirty-four of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming EnvManager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

envmanager.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools9

blog.gitguardian.com/top-secrets-management-tools7

guideflow.com/blog/secrets-management-software5

toolradar.com/guides/best-secrets-management-tools3

worldmetrics.org/best/secrets-management-software3

cyberpresso.com/reviews/best-secrets-management-tools2

cybersecurityessential.com/cloud-security/secrets-management/secrets-management-vault-aws-2

cybervendorguide.com/blog/secrets-management-pricing-breakdown-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EnvManager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EnvManager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at envmanager.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.