Docsumo vs Amazon Textract
One of fourteen models named Docsumo first on the direct prompt; zero named Amazon Textract. Docsumo was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Amazon Textract by thirteen and Docsumo carries 23 labels and Amazon Textract 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Amazon Textract
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the intelligent document processing page.
By framing
DocsumoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAmazon TextractAcross every category in the October 2026 Edition, Docsumo and Amazon Textract were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 74 answers naming Docsumo and the 77 naming Amazon Textract. In those answers Amazon Textract took the first choice one time and Docsumo six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectAT | ParaphraseAT | ComparativeAT | Budget-constrainedAT | Scale-constrainedAT | NegativeAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | AT | AT | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | AT | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | AT | AT | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | AT | AT | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | AT | | AT | |||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | AT | AT | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | AT | AT | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | AT | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | AT | AT | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | AT | | AT | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | AT | AT |
DocsumoAT Amazon Textract first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Docsumo on the left and Amazon Textract on the right.The direct prompt
Docsumo first, Amazon Textract not the choice
1 of 14 modelsAmazon Textract was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Docsumo22%#1 of 14Docsumo6%#3 of 11Docsumo0%#– of 10What the models said about Docsumo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Worth testing, but get a quote before committing: Docsumo. ... production pricing is custom and setup fees may apply.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Parseur (free plan → $39/month Pro) or Docsumo (14-day free trial → $299/month Business) are the best starting points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Nanonets or Docsumo offer the best balance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Nanonets or Docsumo if you want fast time-to-value and manageable costs” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Amazon Textract
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid if you are non-technical: Azure AI and AWS Textract” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be especially cautious if... custom extraction is developer-centric and that handwriting and language support need testing.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Raw" Cloud Provider APIs (Without a Custom Interface) * Examples: Standalone use of AWS Textract” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would suggest starting with Google Cloud Document AI or Amazon Textract” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If cost is the primary constraint, Amazon Textract is hard to beat” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you're already on AWS and need just extraction APIs, Textract's 3-month free tier and pay-per-page model is the cheapest to trial.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.