Every category where a model named Cyware for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SOAR platforms	Security operations	0%	17 of 49	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Tines at 47%
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	30 of 128	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cyware yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cyware across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need intel management + sharing + collaboration: ThreatConnect, Anomali, or Cyware” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · direct prompt · alternative

“Operationalization & sharing | Automation, ISAC-ready; good integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · scale prompt · alternative

“High\u2011volume enterprise with multitenancy: Cyware SOAR or Devo SOAR.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SOAR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose ThreatConnect or Cyware if your priority is operationalization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Broad platform that can feel complex to set up.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Threat intel · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cyware, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyware was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future13 of 287Not in the top three

Cortex XSOAR12 of 287Not in the top three

Splunk SOAR12 of 280Not in the top three

ThreatConnect12 of 280Not in the top three

Tines11 of 282Not in the top three

D3 Security Smart SOAR11 of 281Not in the top three

FortiSOAR9 of 280Not in the top three

Google Security Operations SOAR9 of 280Not in the top three

Swimlane9 of 280Not in the top three

Torq8 of 281Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cyware. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 28 answers that named Cyware and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com12

blinkops.com11

paloaltonetworks.com11

analyticsinsight.net9

gartner.com9

cyware.comYour site8

guptadeepak.com8

guideflow.com6

aimultiple.com5

checkthat.ai5

Seventy-six of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming Cyware came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blinkops.com/blog/soar-platforms11

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soar-tools-comparison11

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms9

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions8

expertinsights.com/network-security/the-top-soar-solutions8

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-solutions7

guideflow.com/blog/soar-software6

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-soar-platforms-20266

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cyware

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cyware; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cyware (CTIX - Cyber Threat Intelligence Exchange) 1Cyware SOAR 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cyware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cyware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cyware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.