Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 5 → 7 of 55
2 categories · RankedCynet 360 AutoXDR
21Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in XDR for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 58 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 62
4%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 58
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In xdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cynet 360 AutoXDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 4% | 6 of 58 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40% | =heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 94 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cynet 360 AutoXDR held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · XDR · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | 5% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 58, unchanged |
| AI security | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 94 of 233, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cynet 360 AutoXDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cynet 360 AutoXDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative10 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or using Cynet (which includes 24/7 human monitoring) will actually save you money in the long run” Gemini 3.5 Flash · XDR · budget prompt · first choice
“Cynet 360 AutoXDR is the standout choice for companies with limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · XDR · budget prompt · first choice
“Cynet is also a strong candidate because its XDR + MDR offering is positioned for SMB to mid-market” Perplexity Sonar · XDR · budget prompt · alternative
“Runner-Up: Cynet 360 AutoXDR Best for companies that want a "one-vendor-does-everything" approach” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI security · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cynet 360 AutoXDR, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cynet 360 AutoXDR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cynet 360 AutoXDR, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cynet 360 AutoXDR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cynet 360 AutoXDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Cynet 360 AutoXDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
paloaltonetworks.com14
sentinelone.com12
cyberpress.org10
cybersecuritynews.com10
cynet.comYour site9
expertinsights.com8
g2.com8
gartner.com7
gbhackers.com7
huntress.com7
Eighty-three of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Cynet 360 AutoXDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cynet.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cynet 360 AutoXDR takes 4% of first choices and Microsoft Defender XDR takes 40%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cynet.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cynet 360 AutoXDR takes 4% of first choices and Microsoft Defender XDR takes 40%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “xdr platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “xdr platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“cynet 360 autoxdr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,782 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,335 · 191 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,913
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 58 in XDR
Segment leader
40%
Microsoft Defender XDR
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cynet.com
563
subdomains included
Content
256
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
19 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 178 | 28 | 2026-09-28 | XDR, Endpoint protection | |
| Comparison | 47 | 5 | 2026-08-06 | EDR, XDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2026-04-02 | XDR, EDR | |
| News or press | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Cynet v5 0 brings data residency to australia and new zealand blog
- 2026-09-25Cynet v5 0 brings data residency to canada blog
- 2026-09-22Cynet v5 0 blog
- 2026-09-22Cynet v5 0 for msps manage every client environment like its the only one blog
- 2026-09-17Inside cynets settra ransomware investigation blog
- 2026-09-17Settra ransomware inside a new enterprise grade extortion threat blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cynet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name EDR (10); 9 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Cynet 360 AutoXDR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cynet 360 AutoXDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cynet 1Cynet 360 1
Follow Cynet 360 AutoXDR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cynet 360 AutoXDR is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Cynet 360 AutoXDR is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an autonomous breach protection platform
- For
- SMEs and MSPs
- Price stated
- 24/7 MDR service without additional cost cynet.com/xdr-security/top-xdr-security-solutions
- Free plan or trial
- Get a free trial of Cynet 360 cynet.com/xdr-security/top-xdr-security-solutions
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Cynet 360 AutoXDR's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cynet.com/xdr-security/top-xdr-security-solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cynet 360 AutoXDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cynet 360 AutoXDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cynet 360 AutoXDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cynet 360 AutoXDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cynet 360 AutoXDR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.