IT AI Index

Index › Products › Coalesce Catalog · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Coalesce Catalog

5Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Coalesce Catalog was named 1 time in Data catalogs, where Atlan led with 44%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 109

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In data catalogs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coalesce Catalog for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data catalogs and governance	Data platform	0%	28 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Atlan at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coalesce Catalog yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coalesce Catalog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Teams Heavy on Transformations: Coalesce Catalog” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coalesce Catalog, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coalesce Catalog was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Secoda5 of 51Not among the top eight

Select Star4 of 52Not among the top eight

OpenMetadata4 of 51Not among the top eight

Alation4 of 50Not among the top eight

Collibra4 of 50Not among the top eight

DataHub2 of 50Not among the top eight

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud2 of 50Not among the top eight

Decube1 of 51Not among the top eight

AWS Lake Formation / Glue1 of 50Not among the top eight

Amundsen1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coalesce Catalog. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Coalesce Catalog and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ovaledge.com5

atlan.com4

dqlabs.ai4

kanerika.com4

reddit.com4

blog.decisionx.ai3

data-pilot.com3

datastackindex.com3

medium.com3

coalesce.ioYour site2

Thirty-three of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Coalesce Catalog came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dqlabs.ai/blog/best-data-catalog-tools-in-2026-a-practitioners-buyer-guide4

kanerika.com/blogs/data-catalog-tools4

ovaledge.com/blog/top-data-catalogs4

atlan.com/data-catalog-tools3

blog.decisionx.ai/blog/top-data-catalog-platforms3

data-pilot.com/blog/open-source-data-catalog3

medium.com/@reliabledataengineering/18-data-catalog-tools-that-teams-actually-use-ee594eb73

datastackindex.com/data-observability/tools/select-star2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on coalesce.io

1,100

subdomains included

Content

318

counted in the table below

Documentation

513

Product · Integration

44 · 8

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Conference or event	127	3	2026-08-07	ETL
Glossary or explainer	55	0	2025-09-09	ETL
Podcast or video	37	0	2026-03-16
Case study	36	1	2026-08-18
Report or ebook	30	2	2026-07-28
Comparison	22	0	2026-04-24	ETL
Webinar or virtual event	7	0	2025-11-10	ETL
Blog	3	0	2025-10-17
News or press	1	0	2022-09-28

Most recent

2026-08-18Vodafoneziggo standardizes at scale with coalesce case study
2026-08-07The end of data exhaustion conference or event
2026-07-28Agentic data engineering guide report or ebook
2026-07-10The definitive guide to building data products report or ebook
2026-07-08Hands on with coalesce mcps playbooks for team wide audit ready data workflows conference or event
2026-07-06Hands on with coalesce mcps using skills to automate data engineering workflows conference or event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page coalesce.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Coalesce Catalog

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Coalesce Catalog is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Discover, document, and govern every data asset with AI
coalesce.io
For: people and AI agents
coalesce.io
Free plan or trial: Try Coalesce for free coalesce.io
Certifications: SOC 2ISO 27001:2022GDPR
Hosting: Global
Customers named: DoctolibRedwood Logistics1-800-Flowers.comVodafoneZiggoSecurity BenefitCOLTENEEcoVadisTexas Mutual
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations

What Coalesce Catalog's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: coalesce.io, trust.coalesce.io, coalesce.io/product, coalesce.io/customer-stories, coalesce.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coalesce Catalog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coalesce Catalog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coalesce Catalog by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Coalesce Catalog is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Coalesce Catalog, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.