Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 of 54, unchanged
1 category · RankedTetrate Agent Router Enterprise
11Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in LLM gateways for enterprise buyers
Rank 54 of 69 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market54 of 69
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 87
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
In llm gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 0% | 54 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · LLM gateways · by segment
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 18 → 7 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM gateways | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 69, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tetrate.ioYour site11
getmaxim.ai10
openrouter.ai7
dev.to5
truefoundry.com5
cequence.ai4
dataiku.com4
llmgateway.io4
atlan.com3
cloudzero.com3
Forty-five of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tetrate.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tetrate.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise takes 0% of first choices and LiteLLM takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “llm gateway”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “llm gateways”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“tetrate agent router enterprise”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 68,356 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,143 · 42 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,973
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 54 of 69 in LLM gateways
Segment leader
31%
LiteLLM
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tetrate.io
4,116
subdomains included
Content
837
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,199
Product · Integration
19 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 393 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | API gateways, WAF | |
| Glossary or explainer | 205 | 9 | 2026-09-26 | API gateways, LLM gateways | |
| Template or tool | 79 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 71 | undated | |||
| News or press | 47 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | API gateways | |
| Conference or event | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Enabling agentic developers blog
- 2026-09-26Ai cost visibility by team user customer glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-26Ai gateway deployment models self hosted hybrid data residency glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-26How an ai gateway fits kubernetes eks and coding tools glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-26How to govern mcp server traffic with an mcp gateway glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-26Llm provider failover when a model provider goes down glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tetrate.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise; a claim can dispute any of them.
Tetrate 1
Follow Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the AI gateway enterprises run in production
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Receive a customized quote tailored to your specific business needs and environment. tetrate.io/contact/pricing-request
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMP ReadyGDPR Compliance
- Hosting
- any geoany infraany modelregionzip codeyour own VPCon-premisesair-gapped
- Customers named
- ORYInformatica
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: tetrate.io, tetrate.io/contact/pricing-request, tetrate.io/trust, tetrate.io/solutions/fips, tetrate.io/about/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tetrate Agent Router Enterprise, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.