4 categories · RankedCloudeagle
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS management platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 7 of 64 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 2% | 18 of 233 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Enterprise architecture tools | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 68 of 113 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25% | |
| SaaS security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 63 of 95 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Cloudeagle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“CloudEagle - A procurement-focused SaaS management platform with broad discovery coverage, suitable for mid-market and enterprise teams” Llama 4 Maverick · SaaS management · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest overall choice is usually CloudEagle” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS management · direct prompt · first choice
“Secondary: CloudEagle (AI Governance & Spend Control)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For full SaaS lifecycle management: CloudEagle” Mistral Small · SaaS management · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“mention performance concerns for AvePoint and CloudEagle” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudeagle, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudeagle was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Cloudeagle and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Ninety-six of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Cloudeagle came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cloudeagle.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cloudeagle takes 4% of first choices and Torii takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“cloudeagle”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 28,845 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,124 · 83 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,178
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 9 clicks and $325 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 964 | 76 | 2026-09-29 | IGA, ITAM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 118 | 15 | 2026-09-23 | IGA, CSPM | |
| Comparison | 98 | 6 | 2026-09-25 | IGA, ITAM | |
| Case study | 64 | 38 | 2026-09-03 | ITAM | |
| Template or tool | 53 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 53 | 9 | 2026-08-12 | IGA, ITAM | |
| Report or ebook | 38 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 29 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 19 | 0 | 2025-07-14 | ITAM, IGA | |
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Causes of data breaches blog
- 2026-09-28Agentic ai governance challenges and best practices blog
- 2026-09-28How to use claude more efficiently 10 token saving tips blog
- 2026-09-27Ai security tools blog
- 2026-09-27Best identity security platforms blog
- 2026-09-27Claude code security risks blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cloudeagle.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name IGA (25); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Cloudeagle
Follow Cloudeagle
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cloudeagle is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise AI Governance and SaaS Management Platform
- For
- IT and Security teams
- Price stated
- Contact for pricing cloudeagle.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial cloudeagle.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 500 cloudeagle.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2HIPAAPCI DSSSOXGDPRISO 27001
- Customers named
- RingCentralAutomation AnywhereShijiRec RoomICEYEIterative HealthJoVeLapzo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What Cloudeagle's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloudeagle.ai, cloudeagle.ai/pricing, cloudeagle.ai/product/ai-governance, cloudeagle.ai/customers, cloudeagle.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudeagle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudeagle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudeagle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cloudeagle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cloudeagle, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.