Every category where a model named Trelica for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SaaS management platforms	IT operations and endpoint	0%	16 of 64	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trelica yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trelica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look for more cost-effective, transparently priced options like Trelica, Corma, or Nudge Security” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose Trelica (1Password) if you are a mid-sized company looking for a lightweight, affordable tool to track license entitlements” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Other platforms that are mentioned as potential alternatives include Torii, Zylo, Bettercloud, and Trelica.” Llama 4 Maverick · SaaS management · negative prompt · alternative

“Other platforms like BetterCloud, Torii, Trelica, and Zylo are generally considered more reliable” Mistral Small · SaaS management · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trelica, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trelica was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zylo19 of 253Not among the top eight

Zluri19 of 252Not among the top eight

Torii16 of 256Not among the top eight

BetterCloud15 of 252Not among the top eight

Productiv13 of 250Not among the top eight

Cledara7 of 252Not among the top eight

1Password SaaS Manager7 of 250Not among the top eight

Flexera One7 of 250Not among the top eight

Cloudeagle6 of 250Not among the top eight

Vertice6 of 250Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trelica. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Trelica and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

toriihq.com14

reddit.com12

zluri.com11

gartner.com9

block64.com8

zylo.com8

corma.io7

g2.com6

spendhound.com6

1password.com5

No domain is on file for Trelica, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

block64.com/blog/the-best-saas-management-tools-2026-guide8

reddit.com/r/ITManagers/comments/175o73t/saas_management_platforms7

reddit.com/r/ITManagers/comments/zgb7ux/saas_management_platform7

spendhound.com/blog/best-saas-management-platforms6

toriihq.com/articles/seven-best-saas-management-platforms6

zluri.com/blog/saas-management-platforms6

growrk.com/blog/saas-management-platform5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-saas-management-platform5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Trelica stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“trelica”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 64 in saas management

Segment leader

34%

Torii

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Trelica

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trelica; a claim can dispute any of them.

Trelica (1Password) 1Trelica (now 1Password SaaS Manager) 1

Follow Trelica

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trelica's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trelica, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trelica by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Trelica is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trelica, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.