IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › CloudBees Feature Management · September 2026 Edition

CloudBees · 1 category · Named, not ranked

CloudBees Feature Management

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CloudBees Feature Management was named 1 time in Feature flags, where LaunchDarkly led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market16 of 31

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 33

under the label threshold

In feature flags · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CloudBees Feature Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Feature flags	Developer platform	0%	16 of 31	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by LaunchDarkly at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudBees Feature Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudBees Feature Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“worth considering if you need an enterprise-ready solution with robust deployment rules and segmentation” Perplexity Sonar · Feature flags · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudBees Feature Management, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudBees Feature Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LaunchDarkly3 of 32Not in the top three

Unleash3 of 30Not in the top three

Flagsmith2 of 30Not in the top three

Split2 of 30Not in the top three

GrowthBook1 of 30Not in the top three

Harness1 of 30Not in the top three

Harness Feature Flags1 of 30Not in the top three

Kameleoon1 of 30Not in the top three

Optimizely1 of 30Not in the top three

Statsig1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudBees Feature Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named CloudBees Feature Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

growthbook.io2

kameleoon.com2

abtasty.com1

amplitude.com1

cadence.withremote.ai1

cloudbees.comYour site1

default.com1

f6s.com1

flagsmith.com1

gartner.com1

Eleven of the twelve domain citations in answers naming CloudBees Feature Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

abtasty.com/blog/feature-management-tools1

amplitude.com/compare/best-feature-flag-tools-for-startups1

amplitude.com/compare/top-feature-flag-solutions-for-product-teams1

cadence.withremote.ai/blog/best-feature-flag-platforms1

cloudbees.com/capabilities/feature-management1

cloudbees.com/products/feature-management/comparison1

default.com/post/b2b-sales-tools1

f6s.com/software/category/feature-management1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudBees Feature Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudBees Feature Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudbees.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.