Every category where a model named CloudBees CI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CI/CD platforms	Developer platform	0%	36 of 45	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by GitHub Actions at 65%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudBees CI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudBees CI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why to avoid: Feature Deprecation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CI/CD · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudBees CI, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudBees CI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GitLab CI/CD14 of 157Not in the top three

GitHub Actions14 of 154Not in the top three

Jenkins12 of 151Not in the top three

CircleCI10 of 150Not in the top three

Azure DevOps7 of 150Not in the top three

Buildkite4 of 151Not in the top three

Harness4 of 150Not in the top three

JetBrains TeamCity4 of 150Not in the top three

Atlassian Bamboo3 of 150Not in the top three

Atlassian2 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudBees CI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named CloudBees CI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

octopus.com9

semaphore.io9

toolradar.com9

blog.jetbrains.com7

deployhq.com7

checkthat.ai6

circleci.com6

about.gitlab.com5

devopsness.com5

in-com.com5

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming CloudBees CI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

octopus.com/devops/ci-cd/ci-cd-tools-for-enterprise8

toolradar.com/blog/best-ci-cd-tools8

deployhq.com/blog/best-ci-cd-software-top-10-tools-to-know-in-20257

blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2026/03/best-ci-tools6

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-ci-cd-tools5

in-com.com/blog/top-ci-cd-tools-comparison-for-enterprises-architectures-pipelines-and-del5

semaphore.io/blog/best-ci-cd-tools5

vendorbenchmark.com/blog/ci-cd-platform-pricing-benchmark-comparison5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CloudBees CI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CloudBees CI; a claim can dispute any of them.

CloudBees 1CloudBees (CI) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudBees CI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudBees CI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudbees.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.