| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | Network and edge | 19% | 2 of 73 | 19% | 43 | accepted challenger | ▼−11Since September 2026: 30% → 18%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | 30% | 18% | ▼−11Since September 2026: 30% → 18%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 2 of 73, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would generally recommend Cisco Meraki SD-WAN if you want the best balance of simplicity, fast deployment, and reliable midmarket fit” Perplexity Sonar · SD-WAN · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloud-managed, dead-simple setup (zero-touch provisioning), great for distributed B2B sites... Meraki/Fortinet shine for ease/cost” Grok 4.20 · SD-WAN · direct prompt · first choice
“If your budget is tight right now and you cannot afford large upfront hardware purchases, Meraki is arguably the best option.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · budget prompt · first choice
“the market has coalesced around two primary leaders for this segment: Fortinet Secure SD-WAN and Cisco Meraki SD-WAN” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Unlike competitors (like Cisco Meraki or VeloCloud), you do not need to pay a premium bandwidth-based or SD-WAN-specific license” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SD-WAN · budget prompt · soft negative
“Great for ease of use and unified Wi-Fi management, though slightly less granular control than the dedicated players above.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · scale prompt · soft negative
“there is no escape valve. Once you commit to Meraki licenses, you will pay their price increases indefinitely” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
“describe it as easier to use but more limited, with fewer and more basic features than Cisco Viptela” Perplexity Sonar · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 119 of the 126 answers that named Cisco Meraki SD-WAN and are not a share of its labels.
401 of the 443 domain citations in answers naming Cisco Meraki SD-WAN came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cisco Meraki SD-WAN's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: talentbridge.cisco.com/job/cisco-sd-wan-engineer-56524, talentbridge.cisco.com/job/senior-wired-network-engineer-design-implementation-cisco-sd-wan-56544. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cisco Meraki SD-WAN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cisco Meraki SD-WAN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cisco Meraki SD-WAN by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN is among the products AI models recommend first in SD-WAN this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.