AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › SD-WAN › Cisco Meraki SD-WAN vs Cato SASE Cloud
SD-WAN · October 2026 Edition

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN vs Cato SASE Cloud

Three of fourteen models named Cisco Meraki SD-WAN first on the direct prompt; three named Cato SASE Cloud. Cisco Meraki SD-WAN was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Cato SASE Cloud by twelve and Cisco Meraki SD-WAN carries 43 labels and Cato SASE Cloud 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Cato SASE Cloud

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share19%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4327A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Fortinet Secure SD-WAN was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Fortinet Secure SD-WAN vs Cisco Meraki SD-WAN · Fortinet Secure SD-WAN vs Cato SASE Cloud · Cisco Meraki SD-WAN vs Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SD-WAN page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Cisco Meraki SD-WANFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCato SASE Cloud
Direct33
Paraphrase50
Comparative00
Budget-constrained203 against Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
Scale-constrained001 against Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
Negative014 against Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 126 answers naming Cisco Meraki SD-WAN and the 126 naming Cato SASE Cloud. In those answers Cato SASE Cloud took the first choice two times and Cisco Meraki SD-WAN fifteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cisco Meraki SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN Cato SASE Cloud first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN on the left and Cato SASE Cloud on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cisco Meraki SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud stood in it.

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN first, Cato SASE Cloud an alternative

3 of 14 modelsCato SASE Cloud was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastCisco Meraki SD-WAN, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: HPE Aruba EdgeConnect, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
Qwen 3.7 FlashCisco Meraki SD-WAN, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cato SASE Cloud, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Muse Glimmer 30BCisco Meraki SD-WAN, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cato SASE Cloud, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, FatPipe SD-WAN, HPE Aruba EdgeConnect

Cato SASE Cloud first, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN an alternative

3 of 14 modelsCisco Meraki SD-WAN was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cato SASE Cloud alternatives: Aryaka, Comcast Business, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN, MetTel, Windstream
DeepSeek V4 FlashCato SASE Cloud, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
GLM 4.7 FlashXCato SASE Cloud alternatives: Barracuda SecureEdge SD-WAN, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, Fortinet Secure SD-WAN, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashFortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cato SASE Cloud, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Perplexity SonarFortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cato SASE Cloud, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, HPE Aruba EdgeConnect, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
Kimi K2Fortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cato SASE Cloud, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
MiniMax M2.5HPE Aruba EdgeConnect, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN alternatives: Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
GPT-6 LunaFortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cato SASE Cloud, Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniFortinet Secure SD-WAN alternatives: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
Mistral SmallHPE Aruba EdgeConnect, VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN alternatives: Fortinet Secure SD-WAN
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN leads by forty points.
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN42%#1 of 9
Cato SASE Cloud2%#5 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN leads by thirteen points.
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN19%#2 of 10
Cato SASE Cloud6%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Cato SASE Cloud leads at enterprise.
Cato SASE Cloud9%#3 of 9
Cisco Meraki SD-WAN0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Unlike competitors (like Cisco Meraki or VeloCloud), you do not need to pay a premium bandwidth-based or SD-WAN-specific license” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Great for ease of use and unified Wi-Fi management, though slightly less granular control than the dedicated players above.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“there is no escape valve. Once you commit to Meraki licenses, you will pay their price increases indefinitely” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would generally recommend Cisco Meraki SD-WAN if you want the best balance of simplicity, fast deployment, and reliable midmarket fit” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloud-managed, dead-simple setup (zero-touch provisioning), great for distributed B2B sites... Meraki/Fortinet shine for ease/cost” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“If your budget is tight right now and you cannot afford large upfront hardware purchases, Meraki is arguably the best option.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cato SASE Cloud

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Cato Networks and Fortinet are the two names that come up most consistently as the strongest fits” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Cato Networks offers a cloud-native SASE platform that's been scored as the easiest-to-use platform by Netify for the third year running” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“1) Cato Networks - Why it fits mid-market: A single converged SD-WAN + SASE platform with a cloud-native private backbone.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.