| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | Network and edge | 0% | 10 of 73 | 14% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 10 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the go-to platform for telecom carriers and large MSPs looking to build and white-label their own managed SD-WAN services” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SD-WAN · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Versa if: You are heavily reliant on Cloud computing and want to keep your networking infrastructure virtual.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · budget prompt · alternative
“some vendors like Cisco, Fatpipe, and Versa Networks are mentioned as having good SD-WAN solutions” Llama 4 Maverick · SD-WAN · negative prompt · alternative
“Versa | Through service providers | Good if you want a carrier-managed SD-WAN” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SD-WAN · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“faced severe financial difficulties and restructuring... their instability made many large enterprises hesitant” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
“calls out its high price point and limited geographic presence” Perplexity Sonar · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
“Versa has been flagged as having a "poor customer experience score."” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 66 answers that named Versa Secure SD-WAN and are not a share of its labels.
230 of the 230 domain citations in answers naming Versa Secure SD-WAN came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Versa Secure SD-WAN's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: docs.versa-networks.com/Secure_SD-WAN, academy.versa-networks.com/versa-secure-sd-wan-practitioner, academy.versa-networks.com/secure-sd-wan-and-multi-cloud-transformation, academy.versa-networks.com/ipv6-tunneling-configuration-for-versa-secure-sd-wan, docs.versa-networks.com/Secure_SD-WAN/03_Troubleshooting. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Versa Secure SD-WAN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Versa Secure SD-WAN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Versa Secure SD-WAN by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: