| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | Network and edge | 9% | 3 of 53 | 47% | 32 | criticized challenger |
| SASE platforms | Network and edge | 0% | 39 of 43 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cato SASE Cloud at 28% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cisco is often the default choice. - Best for complex routing, large WAN hierarchies, and Cisco-centric environments.” GPT-5.4 mini · SD-WAN · comparative prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget with good features, Cisco SD-WAN (Viptela) or Fortinet SD-WAN would be your best choices” MiniMax M2.5 · SD-WAN · budget prompt · first choice
“The best SD-WAN platform for a company with a limited budget is Cisco SD-WAN (Viptela) at $20-$100 per site per month” Llama 4 Maverick · SD-WAN · budget prompt · first choice
“Cisco SD-WAN (Viptela) and Fortinet SD-WAN are the most recommended options for budget-conscious companies” Mistral Small · SD-WAN · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cisco SD-WAN systems have been actively targeted by malicious cyber actors globally, with attackers exploiting an authentication bypass vulnerability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SD-WAN · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some networking professionals actively advise avoiding Viptela in favor of alternative Cisco platforms (like Meraki) or competing vendors.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid single-vendor solutions that are essentially two separate platforms (like Cisco Secure Access and Catalyst SD-WAN)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · negative prompt · hard negative
“If a partner tries to sell you traditional Viptela hardware, avoid it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SD-WAN · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 112 answers that named Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN and are not a share of its labels.
361 of the 394 domain citations in answers naming Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cisco.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.