| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | Network and edge | 50% | 1 of 73 | 3% | 64 | endorsed leader | ▲+7Since September 2026: 41% → 48%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SASE platforms | Network and edge | 0% | 19 of 45 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Cato Networks at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | 41% | 48% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 41% → 48%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 73, unchanged |
| SASE | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 19 of 45 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Fortinet Secure SD-WAN is frequently highlighted as the "budget champion,"... If you need both networking and security in one, Fortinet may be the best fit.” Mistral Small · SD-WAN · budget prompt · first choice
“Fortinet Secure SD-WAN (Best Overall Value & Security Integration) ... widely considered the market leader for mid-market organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SD-WAN · direct prompt · first choice
“If your primary goal is consolidating security and networking onto a single cost-effective firewall appliance, choose Fortinet.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SD-WAN · comparative prompt · first choice
“the safest default recommendation is Fortinet Secure SD-WAN if you want the best balance of security, simplicity, and cost” GPT-5.4 mini · SD-WAN · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Requires more configuration expertise for advanced features, has a larger upfront learning curve, higher hardware footprint” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
“warns about vendor lock-in and limited third-party integrations” Perplexity Sonar · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 174 of the 186 answers that named Fortinet Secure SD-WAN and are not a share of its labels.
546 of the 624 domain citations in answers naming Fortinet Secure SD-WAN came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Fortinet Secure SD-WAN's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: community.fortinet.com/fortigate-3/technical-tip-fortinet-s-secure-sd-wan-resource-list-109160, community.fortinet.com/blogs-103/aws-cloud-wan-integration-fortinet-sd-wan-for-secure-private-access-124601, community.fortinet.com/blogs-103/aws-cloud-wan-integration-fortinet-sd-wan-for-secure-branch-networking-124862, fortinet.com/fr/offers/secure-sd-wan-assessment, fortinet.com/solutions/service-provider/managed-secure-sd-wan-service-with-fortinet. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fortinet Secure SD-WAN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fortinet Secure SD-WAN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fortinet Secure SD-WAN by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Fortinet Secure SD-WAN first in SD-WAN this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.