Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 29 of 69
FatPipe · 1 category · RankedFatPipe SD-WAN
19Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in SD-WAN for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 73 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of FatPipe SD-WAN →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 71
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 73
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise15 of 52
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In sd-wan · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FatPipe SD-WAN for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | Network and edge | 0% | 15 of 73 | 30% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, FatPipe SD-WAN held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SD-WAN · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 15 of 67
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 10 of 48
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD-WAN | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 15 of 73 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated FatPipe SD-WAN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated FatPipe SD-WAN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“some vendors like Cisco, Fatpipe, and Versa Networks are mentioned as having good SD-WAN solutions” Llama 4 Maverick · SD-WAN · negative prompt · alternative
“Highly rated in SoftwareReviews SD-WAN - Midmarket category with a 9.2 Composite Score” Muse Glimmer 30B · SD-WAN · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“flagged for below-average market visibility and limited geographic reach, which can limit support and roadmap certainty” Muse Glimmer 30B · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
“Niche or Lower-Quadrant Players ... poor market transformation/execution” Grok 4.20 · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some vendors like Fatpipe have had mixed reviews” MiniMax M2.5 · SD-WAN · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FatPipe SD-WAN, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FatPipe SD-WAN was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FatPipe SD-WAN, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FatPipe SD-WAN was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FatPipe SD-WAN. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named FatPipe SD-WAN and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com18
it-ai-index.com11
interfacesystems.com9
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com7
gartner.com6
myhospitalnow.com5
zpesystems.com5
cisco.com4
devopsschool.com4
em360tech.com4
Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming FatPipe SD-WAN came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fatpipe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FatPipe SD-WAN takes 0% of first choices and Fortinet Secure SD-WAN takes 50%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fatpipe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FatPipe SD-WAN takes 0% of first choices and Fortinet Secure SD-WAN takes 50%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sd-wan platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sd-wan platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“fatpipe sd-wan”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 33 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 730
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 73 in SD-WAN
Segment leader
50%
Fortinet Secure SD-WAN
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fatpipe.com
82
subdomains included
Content
22
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
31 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 19 | 0 | 2018-07-15 | SD-WAN, SASE | |
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2018-07-15View a short video blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fatpipe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as FatPipe SD-WAN
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FatPipe SD-WAN; a claim can dispute any of them.
Fatpipe 6FatPipe 3
Follow FatPipe SD-WAN
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
FatPipe is the company behind FatPipe SD-WAN.ShowHide
The company
FatPipe is the company behind FatPipe SD-WAN.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from FatPipe
- FatPipe Networks
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unified SD-WAN, networking, network security, cybersecurity, and SASE - managed and delivered as a service.
- For
- Enterprise
- Customers named
- Project Darwin
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What FatPipe SD-WAN's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fatpipe.com, fatpipe.com/products/5g.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FatPipe SD-WAN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FatPipe SD-WAN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FatPipe SD-WAN by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where FatPipe SD-WAN is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name FatPipe SD-WAN, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.