Checkmarx · 1 category · Named, not rankedCheckmarx ASPM
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 24 of 70 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Checkmarx ASPM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Checkmarx if you want a mature AppSec platform with strong SDLC integration and orchestration.” GPT-5.4 mini · ASPM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Well-suited for smaller organizations” MiniMax M2.5 · ASPM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Checkmarx ASPM, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Checkmarx ASPM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Checkmarx ASPM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Twelve of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Checkmarx ASPM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
checkmarx.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Checkmarx ASPM takes 0% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 37%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Its company's site
- checkmarx.com shared with Checkmarx's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 54,982 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,927 · 204 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,902
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Checkmarx ASPM
Follow Checkmarx ASPM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Checkmarx is the company behind Checkmarx ASPM.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company records- Also from Checkmarx
- Checkmarx Codebashing, Checkmarx DAST, Checkmarx One, Checkmarx One ASPM, Checkmarx SCA
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unified Risk Intelligence & Governance (ASPM)
- For
- organizations
- Free plan or trial
- Download your free copy checkmarx.com/report-idc-marketscape-for-aspm-2025
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II CertifiediISO/IEC 27001:2013 Certified
- Customers named
- Best BuyCGI
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Checkmarx ASPM's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: checkmarx.com/appsec-services, checkmarx.com/2024-frost-sullivan-aspm-report-g, checkmarx.com/how-aspm-and-ai-are-reshaping-appsec, checkmarx.com/report-idc-marketscape-for-aspm-2025, checkmarx.com/product/aspm. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Checkmarx ASPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Checkmarx ASPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Checkmarx ASPM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Checkmarx ASPM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Checkmarx ASPM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.