| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web application firewalls | Network and edge | 34% | 2 of 87 | 11% | 27 | endorsed leader |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best web application firewall for a company with a limited budget is Cloudflare WAF, which offers strong protection with a generous free tier and easy setup.” Llama 4 Maverick · WAF · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually Cloudflare WAF if you want the fastest deployment, strong protection, and low operational overhead” Perplexity Sonar · WAF · direct prompt · first choice
“Cloudflare WAF (free tier) is widely regarded as the best web application firewall for companies with a limited budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · WAF · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Cloudflare if you want top-tier performance, global scale, and an intuitive, developer-friendly interface.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · WAF · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cloudflare's WAF scored the *lowest* Security Quality (True Positive Rate) of any major vendor — around 67%” DeepSeek V4 Flash · WAF · negative prompt · soft negative
“Evasion via parsing/content-type tricks; not top in padding/large payload tests.” Grok 4.1 Fast · WAF · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cloudflare WAF | ✅ Vulnerable” Kimi K2 · WAF · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 61 answers that named Cloudflare WAF and are not a share of its labels.
241 of the 241 domain citations in answers naming Cloudflare WAF came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudflare WAF's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudflare WAF, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudflare.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.