Every category where a model named Azure Site Recovery for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Backup and disaster recovery	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	23 of 121	18%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azure Site Recovery yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azure Site Recovery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Azure Site Recovery handles Azure VM failover, recovery plans, and structured DR drills” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best if you are Microsoft-centric:Azure Backup + Azure Site Recovery” GPT-5.4 mini · Backup and DR · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Microsoft-heavy or Azure-native environments” Perplexity Sonar · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Watch Linux distribution support carefully if that's critical to your environment (specifically for Azure Site Recovery).” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Backup and DR · negative prompt · soft negative

“Azure Site Recovery (replication only—no granular restore)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Backup and DR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azure Site Recovery, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure Site Recovery was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Commvault13 of 191Not in the top three

Veeam10 of 197Not in the top three

Rubrik8 of 190Not in the top three

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery7 of 190Not in the top three

Cohesity7 of 190Not in the top three

Zerto7 of 190Not in the top three

Veeam Data Platform6 of 195Not in the top three

Acronis6 of 191Not in the top three

Druva5 of 190Not in the top three

AWS Backup4 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure Site Recovery. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 19 answers that named Azure Site Recovery and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eon.io13

expertinsights.com13

solutionsreview.com13

axcient.com8

checkthat.ai5

controlmonkey.io5

ninjaone.com5

technologymatch.com5

veeam.com5

worldmetrics.org5

Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Azure Site Recovery came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/backup-and-recovery/top-disaster-recovery-dr-software-solutions10

eon.io/blog/best-cloud-disaster-recovery-solutions9

axcient.com/blog/backup-and-disaster-recovery-solutions8

expertinsights.com/backup-and-recovery/the-top-business-continuity-and-disaster-recovery-s7

solutionsreview.com/backup-disaster-recovery/whats-changed-2024-gartner-magic-quadrant-for7

eon.io/blog/enterprise-backup-solutions6

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-disaster-recovery-solutions4

solutionsreview.com/backup-disaster-recovery/the-best-backup-and-disaster-recovery-compani4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Azure Site Recovery

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Azure Site Recovery; a claim can dispute any of them.

Azure Site Recovery (ASR) 1Azure Site Recovery + Azure Backup 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure Site Recovery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure Site Recovery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.