AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Rubrik Security Cloud · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Rubrik Security Cloud

83Judge labels
9First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Backup and DR for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 116 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Rubrik Security Cloud →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In backup and dr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rubrik Security Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Backup and disaster recoveryCloud and infrastructure2%10 of 1166%33accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data security posture managementSecurity operations0%59 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18%

Movement

Since September 2026, Rubrik Security Cloud held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Backup and DR · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 78 → 89 of 107
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 112
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 11% → 16%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Backup and DR0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 10 of 116
DSPM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 59 of 105, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Rubrik Security Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash05005
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2003025
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash04004
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K203104
GLM 4.7 FlashX12003
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels3
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative26 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained12 labels2
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with Rubrik if you are worried about ransomware and want a platform that secures your data with immutability” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Recommended: Veeam or Rubrik” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Backup and DR · direct prompt · first choice
“Consider Rubrik Security Cloud if cyber-recovery ... budget allows; it is more commonly sized for large enterprise but supports mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · Backup and DR · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Rubrik if cyber-resilience, rapid ransomware recovery, and zero-trust security are your absolute top priorities” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“pricier and overkill for simpler needs” Grok 4.20 · Backup and DR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Good, but enterprise-leaning” Grok 4.20 · Backup and DR · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rubrik Security Cloud, over the 82 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rubrik Security Cloud was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Commvault61 of 828Not among the top eight
Cohesity DataProtect58 of 821Not among the top eight
Zerto21 of 820Not among the top eight
Datto SIRIS18 of 820Not among the top eight
Azure Site Recovery14 of 820Not among the top eight
Veritas Alta Data Protection13 of 820Not among the top eight
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery12 of 820Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rubrik Security Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 82 answers that named Rubrik Security Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eon.io44
expertinsights.com41
solutionsreview.com39
veeam.com31
ninjaone.com28
byteplus.com25
cohesity.com21
it-ai-index.com21
worldmetrics.org19
controlmonkey.io18

287 of the 287 domain citations in answers naming Rubrik Security Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rubrik.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rubrik Security Cloud takes 2% of first choices and Veeam Data Platform takes 38%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “backup and disaster recovery solution”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “backup and disaster recovery solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“rubrik security cloud”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 63,198 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,003 · 615 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,552
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
77 ads · 69 text, 4 image, 4 video · 44 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as Rubrik, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 43 in the year, 34 before. 16 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 116 in Backup and DR
Segment leader
38%
Veeam Data Platform
First choices
9 across its categories
Named in
82 answers
Its own site cited
in 74 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on rubrik.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
9
counted in the table below
Documentation
9,981
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Conference or event6undated
News or press3undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rubrik.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Rubrik Security Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rubrik Security Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
Rubrik 25

Follow Rubrik Security Cloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rubrik Security Cloud is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Agentic Cyber Resilience
For
enterprises
Certifications
SOC 1SOC 2ISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018ISO 27701ISO 42001HITRUST
Customers named
Yuba CountyINTEGRIS Health
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Rubrik Security Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: rubrik.com, trust.rubrik.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rubrik Security Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rubrik Security Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rubrik Security Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Rubrik Security Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rubrik Security Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rubrik.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.