IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Rubrik Security Cloud · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Rubrik Security Cloud

11Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Rubrik Security Cloud was named 3 times in Backup and DR, where Veeam led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market32 of 121

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 99

under the label threshold

In backup and dr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Rubrik Security Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Backup and disaster recovery	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	32 of 121	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Veeam at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rubrik Security Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rubrik Security Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for High-Security & Ransomware Resilience... The Catch: Rubrik can be expensive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · direct prompt · alternative

“Rubrik leads for security-first buyers willing to pay a premium” Kimi K2 · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Rubrik leads with built-in zero trust architecture” MiniMax M2.5 · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rubrik Security Cloud, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rubrik Security Cloud was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Veeam Data Platform11 of 118Not in the top three

Commvault7 of 110Not in the top three

Cohesity DataProtect5 of 110Not in the top three

Azure Site Recovery4 of 110Not in the top three

Cohesity4 of 110Not in the top three

Druva Data Security Cloud3 of 110Not in the top three

Zerto3 of 110Not in the top three

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery2 of 110Not in the top three

Acronis Cyber Protect2 of 110Not in the top three

Dell PowerProtect2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rubrik Security Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 11 answers that named Rubrik Security Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eon.io6

solutionsreview.com6

c4cgroup.co.uk5

expertinsights.com5

tech-insider.org5

technologymatch.com5

veeam.com5

peerspot.com4

worldmetrics.org4

g2.com3

Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Rubrik Security Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

c4cgroup.co.uk/guides/veeam-vs-rubrik-cohesity-commvault5

expertinsights.com/backup-and-recovery/the-top-business-continuity-and-disaster-recovery-s5

solutionsreview.com/backup-disaster-recovery/whats-changed-2024-gartner-magic-quadrant-for5

tech-insider.org/nl/veeam-vs-rubrik-vs-cohesity-vs-commvault-20265

technologymatch.com/blog/rubrik-vs-cohesity-vs-veeam-which-cyber-reslience-tool-is-best-fo5

eon.io/blog/enterprise-backup-solutions4

solutionsreview.com/backup-disaster-recovery/the-best-backup-and-disaster-recovery-compani4

worldmetrics.org/best/enterprise-backup-and-recovery-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rubrik Security Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rubrik Security Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rubrik.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.