IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Azure AI Gateway · September 2026 Edition

Azure · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Azure AI Gateway

6Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Azure AI Gateway was named 1 time in LLM gateways, where LiteLLM led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business20 of 44

under the label threshold

Mid-market41 of 63

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 62

under the label threshold

In llm gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Azure AI Gateway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
LLM gateways and observability	Data platform	0%	41 of 63	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azure AI Gateway yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azure AI Gateway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azure AI Gateway, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure AI Gateway was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LiteLLM4 of 60Not in the top three

Kong AI Gateway3 of 61Not in the top three

Portkey3 of 61Not in the top three

Cloudflare AI Gateway2 of 60Not in the top three

Helicone2 of 60Not in the top three

OpenRouter2 of 60Not in the top three

Bifrost1 of 61Not in the top three

Amazon Bedrock1 of 60Not in the top three

Amazon Bedrock Guardrails1 of 60Not in the top three

Astra Security1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure AI Gateway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 6 answers that named Azure AI Gateway and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlan.com1

blueprism.com1

braintrust.dev1

cheatsheetseries.owasp.org1

cybersecuritynews.com1

dataiku.com1

dev.to1

developers.cloudflare.com1

docs.konghq.com1

docs.litellm.ai1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Azure AI Gateway came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlan.com/know/what-is-ai-gateway-llm-gateway1

blueprism.com/guides/ai/ai-gateway/best1

braintrust.dev/articles/best-llm-gateways-20261

cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/LLM_Prompt_Injection_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html1

cybersecuritynews.com/top-enterprise-ai-gateways1

dataiku.com/blog/best-llm-gateways1

dev.to/hadil/top-5-enterprise-ai-gateways-in-2026-ranked-for-scale-governance-production-r1

developers.cloudflare.com/ai-gateway/observability/logging1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure AI Gateway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure AI Gateway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.