IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Zerto · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Zerto

25Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Backup and DR for mid-market buyers
Rank 21 of 121 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In backup and dr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zerto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Backup and disaster recoveryCloud and infrastructure0%21 of 1219%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zerto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zerto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, or AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery if your priority is fast failover and low downtime” Perplexity Sonar · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for near-zero recovery point objectives (RPO) and recovery time objectives (RTO), especially in VMware environments.” Mistral Small · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Zerto, which supports continuous data protection with journal-based point-in-time recovery” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Ultra-low recovery time (RTO) Continuous Data Protection (CDP).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High cost, requires significant WAN bandwidth; usually sold as part of HPE converged infrastructure” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Backup and DR · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zerto, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zerto was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Commvault23 of 251Not in the top three
Rubrik20 of 250Not in the top three
Cohesity17 of 250Not in the top three
Veeam16 of 259Not in the top three
Druva16 of 250Not in the top three
Datto8 of 250Not in the top three
Acronis7 of 250Not in the top three
Azure Site Recovery7 of 250Not in the top three
Veritas5 of 250Not in the top three
Veeam Data Platform4 of 254Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zerto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 25 answers that named Zerto and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Zerto

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zerto; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zerto (HPE) 1Zerto (by HPE) 1Zerto/HPE 1Zerto® (now HPE Zerto) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zerto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zerto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zerto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.