| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backup and disaster recovery | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 21 of 121 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Zerto, Azure Site Recovery, or AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery if your priority is fast failover and low downtime” Perplexity Sonar · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for near-zero recovery point objectives (RPO) and recovery time objectives (RTO), especially in VMware environments.” Mistral Small · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Zerto, which supports continuous data protection with journal-based point-in-time recovery” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Ultra-low recovery time (RTO) Continuous Data Protection (CDP).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“High cost, requires significant WAN bandwidth; usually sold as part of HPE converged infrastructure” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Backup and DR · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 25 answers that named Zerto and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-four of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming Zerto came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zerto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zerto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zerto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.