IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL · September 2026 Edition

Azure · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL was named 3 times in Managed databases, where Amazon RDS led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 73

under the label threshold

Enterprise28 of 78

under the label threshold

In managed databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Managed relational databases	Data platform	0%	26 of 73	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excellent for companies using Microsoft products - Strong security and compliance features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed databases · direct prompt · alternative

“If you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem, Azure Database is a strong contender.” Mistral Small · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“or Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Managed databases · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Amazon RDS10 of 102Not in the top three

Google Cloud SQL9 of 102Not in the top three

Amazon Aurora4 of 102Not in the top three

Azure SQL Database4 of 100Not in the top three

Neon3 of 100Not in the top three

PlanetScale3 of 100Not in the top three

Supabase2 of 101Not in the top three

Oracle Autonomous Database2 of 100Not in the top three

DigitalOcean Managed Databases1 of 101Not in the top three

Linode Managed Databases1 of 101Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 10 answers that named Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tech-insider.org4

cloudexpat.com3

cloudinsight.cc3

estuary.dev3

g2.com3

toolradar.com3

blogs.oracle.com2

devtoolreviews.com2

nearbase.dev2

advisionit.cloud1

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tech-insider.org/aws-rds-vs-azure-database-vs-google-cloud-sql-20264

cloudexpat.com/compare/rds-vs-azure-sql-vs-cloud-sql3

cloudinsight.cc/en/blog/cloud-sql-solutions3

estuary.dev/blog/relational-databases-for-small-businesses3

g2.com/categories/database-as-a-service-dbaas/small-business3

toolradar.com/best/managed-databases/for/small-businesses3

g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-top-relational-database-options-for-small-businesses2

advisionit.cloud/aws-cloud-databases-rds-aurora-dynamodb-documentdb1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure Database for PostgreSQL/MySQL, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.