Every category where a model named AssetTiger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	32 of 61	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AssetTiger yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AssetTiger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AssetTiger (free up to 250 assets, $955 /yr for 250 assets)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Best "Plug-and-Play" SaaS for Medium Fleets: AssetTiger” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

“AssetTiger is a great middle ground” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users have recently noted AssetTiger\u2019s free plan ending and accounts becoming read-only unless upgraded” GPT-5.4 mini · ITAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“AssetTiger's old 250-asset plan) have quietly changed to time-limited trials” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ITAM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AssetTiger, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AssetTiger was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Snipe-IT16 of 1810Not in the top three

Lansweeper8 of 181Not in the top three

BlueTally7 of 180Not in the top three

GLPI6 of 181Not in the top three

NinjaOne6 of 181Not in the top three

Freshservice6 of 180Not in the top three

Reftab6 of 180Not in the top three

Asset Panda5 of 180Not in the top three

ManageEngine AssetExplorer5 of 180Not in the top three

Flexera One4 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AssetTiger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 18 answers that named AssetTiger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rippling.com11

assetmanagement.global10

blog.invgate.com9

virima.com9

appvizer.com7

forbes.com7

cloudaware.com6

reddit.com6

bluetally.com5

g2.com5

Seventy-five of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming AssetTiger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rippling.com/blog/best-it-asset-management-small-business10

assetmanagement.global/blog/best-it-asset-management-software-for-small-businesses8

appvizer.com/magazine/it/itsm/it-asset-management-software7

virima.com/blog/top-asset-management-tools-you-need-to-know-about7

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-it-asset-management-software6

blog.invgate.com/free-it-asset-management-software5

blog.invgate.com/it-asset-management-software5

bluetally.com/blog/12-best-free-it-asset-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AssetTiger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AssetTiger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at assettiger.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.