AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › AssetTiger · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

AssetTiger

15Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AssetTiger was named 5 times in ITAM and 1 other category, where Freshservice led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AssetTiger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
IT asset managementIT operations and endpoint0%15 of 820%4under 10 labels · led by Freshservice at 31%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
IT financial managementIT operations and endpoint0%100 of 1590%1under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%

Movement

Since September 2026, AssetTiger held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · ITAM · by segment

Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 3 → 15 of 67
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 → 15 of 75
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 77 → 71 of 85

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ITAM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 32 → 15 of 82
IT financial mgmt0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 100 of 159, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated AssetTiger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need something simpler and have under 250 assets, AssetTiger is completely free” MiniMax M2.5 · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative
“a straightforward cloud option if you don't want to manage a server” GPT-6 Luna · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative
“AssetTiger is an incredibly affordable cloud-hosted platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AssetTiger, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AssetTiger was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Snipe-IT15 of 1511Not among the top eight
Lansweeper7 of 151Not among the top eight
GLPI7 of 150Not among the top eight
Spiceworks Inventory7 of 150Not among the top eight
BlueTally4 of 152Not among the top eight
ManageEngine AssetExplorer4 of 150Not among the top eight
Freshservice3 of 150Not among the top eight
InvGate Asset Management3 of 150Not among the top eight
NinjaOne3 of 150Not among the top eight
ServiceNow IT Asset Management3 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AssetTiger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named AssetTiger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.invgate.com9
virima.com8
alvao.com7
assettiger.comYour site6
desk365.io6
assetpanda.com5
capterra.com5
deliberatedirections.com5
openmsp.ai5
reddit.com5

Fifty-five of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming AssetTiger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

assettiger.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AssetTiger takes 0% of first choices and Freshservice takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “it asset management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “it asset management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“assettiger”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
50 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 7,006 a month
Searches its site ranks for
279 · 115 in the top three
Sites linking to it
693
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
47 ads · 30 video, 10 text, 7 image · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as XpressMyself.com LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 82 in ITAM
Segment leader
31%
Freshservice
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on assettiger.com
38
subdomains included
Content
17
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog14undatedITAM
Comparison3undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page assettiger.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow AssetTiger

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AssetTiger is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free Asset Tracking & Management Software
For
Organizations worldwide - from five-person startups to multi-campus universities and large enterprises. Schools, hospitals, government agencies, nonprofits, construction firms, IT teams, and manufacturers all use AssetTiger.
Price stated
Free to get started; paid plans from $20/month. assettiger.com
Starting price
20 assettiger.com
Free plan or trial
Free/ 30-day trial. Up to 250 assets. No credit card required. Full features while you try it. assettiger.com
Customers named
Mark, Whiting LawJennifer, Total Assessment SolutionsRobert, Municipal Government AgencyAmanda, K-12 School District
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What AssetTiger's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: assettiger.com, assettiger.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AssetTiger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AssetTiger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AssetTiger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AssetTiger is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AssetTiger, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at assettiger.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.