IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Akamai Prolexic · September 2026 Edition
Akamai · 1 category · Ranked

Akamai Prolexic

143Judge labels
6First choices
36Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in DDoS for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 51 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 50 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In ddos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Akamai Prolexic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
DDoS protectionNetwork and edge0%6 of 5118%50accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Akamai Prolexic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Akamai Prolexic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501023
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash03104
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast02035
Mistral Small12205
DeepSeek V4 Flash04015
Llama 4 Maverick01304
Qwen 3.7 Flash03205
Kimi K203126
GLM 4.7 FlashX05005
MiniMax M2.501012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct26 labelsNone
Paraphrase31 labels5
Comparative28 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained22 labels1
Negative23 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative143 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cloudflare, Akamai Prolexic, and AWS Shield are noted for offering unmetered or more predictable pricing” Mistral Small · DDoS · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Akamai or Azure/AWS-based protection if your environment is already deeply tied to those ecosystems” Perplexity Sonar · DDoS · direct prompt · alternative
“Suitable for mid-sized B2B companies that require enterprise-grade protection and global scrubbing centers.” Mistral Small · DDoS · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“remains the enterprise benchmark where SOC-led mitigation and network-range protection justify the contract” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDoS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget- Akamai Prolexic: Starts around $5,000–$10,000+/month” Kimi K2 · DDoS · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Akamai Prolexic for mid-market unless you have specific enterprise requirements” Kimi K2 · DDoS · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid overbuying: Akamai Prolexic is overkill for small to mid-size organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDoS · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Akamai's lack of transparent pricing on the website makes it potentially less accessible for smaller businesses.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDoS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Akamai Prolexic, over the 143 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akamai Prolexic was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cloudflare139 of 143112Not in the top three
AWS Shield116 of 1431Not in the top three
Imperva88 of 1430Not in the top three
Azure DDoS Protection65 of 1430Not in the top three
Radware61 of 1430Not in the top three
Fastly33 of 1430Not in the top three
Google Cloud Armor27 of 1430Not in the top three
Sucuri21 of 1431Not in the top three
NETSCOUT Arbor15 of 1430Not in the top three
Gcore14 of 1431Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Akamai Prolexic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 121 of the 143 answers that named Akamai Prolexic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org90
cybersecuritynews.com90
flowtriq.com77
gartner.com56
esecurityplanet.com52
geekflare.com44
cloudminister.com41
myrasecurity.com37
radware.com34
fastly.com30

551 of the 551 domain citations in answers naming Akamai Prolexic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Akamai Prolexic

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Akamai Prolexic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Akamai 16Akamai (Prolexic) 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akamai Prolexic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akamai Prolexic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at akamai.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack