| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDoS protection | Network and edge | 0% | 7 of 51 | 14% | 35 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Stick with well-established providers like Cloudflare, Akamai Prolexic, Imperva, AWS Shield, or Azure DDoS Protection” Mistral Small · DDoS · negative prompt · alternative
“AWS Shield/Azure DDoS Protection - If you're already heavily invested in AWS or Azure infrastructure” MiniMax M2.5 · DDoS · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Microsoft Azure includes basic network-level DDoS protection for free on all virtual networks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDoS · budget prompt · alternative
“If 100% on AWS or Azure, seriously consider AWS Shield Advanced or Azure DDoS Protection.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDoS · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget ... Azure DDoS Network Protection: ~$2,944/month” Kimi K2 · DDoS · budget prompt · hard negative
“warns to be cautious with major cloud providers like AWS, GCP, Azure, and Oracle Cloud when relying on them for DDoS defense alone” Perplexity Sonar · DDoS · negative prompt · soft negative
“they are often best used as a secondary layer behind a specialized provider like Cloudflare or Akamai” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DDoS · direct prompt · soft negative
“stronger fit for Azure users, but the paid tier is much more expensive, around $2,944/month” Perplexity Sonar · DDoS · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 90 answers that named Azure DDoS Protection and are not a share of its labels.
328 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming Azure DDoS Protection came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure DDoS Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure DDoS Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.