IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Azure DDoS Protection · September 2026 Edition
Azure · 1 category · Ranked

Azure DDoS Protection

90Judge labels
1First choices
11Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in DDoS for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 51 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 35 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ddos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Azure DDoS Protection for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
DDoS protectionNetwork and edge0%7 of 5114%35accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azure DDoS Protection yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azure DDoS Protection across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar00022
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small03205
DeepSeek V4 Flash02204
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash03014
Kimi K203014
GLM 4.7 FlashX03104
MiniMax M2.503104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative21 labelsNone
Budget-constrained19 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labels1
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Stick with well-established providers like Cloudflare, Akamai Prolexic, Imperva, AWS Shield, or Azure DDoS Protection” Mistral Small · DDoS · negative prompt · alternative
“AWS Shield/Azure DDoS Protection - If you're already heavily invested in AWS or Azure infrastructure” MiniMax M2.5 · DDoS · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Microsoft Azure includes basic network-level DDoS protection for free on all virtual networks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDoS · budget prompt · alternative
“If 100% on AWS or Azure, seriously consider AWS Shield Advanced or Azure DDoS Protection.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDoS · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget ... Azure DDoS Network Protection: ~$2,944/month” Kimi K2 · DDoS · budget prompt · hard negative
“warns to be cautious with major cloud providers like AWS, GCP, Azure, and Oracle Cloud when relying on them for DDoS defense alone” Perplexity Sonar · DDoS · negative prompt · soft negative
“they are often best used as a secondary layer behind a specialized provider like Cloudflare or Akamai” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DDoS · direct prompt · soft negative
“stronger fit for Azure users, but the paid tier is much more expensive, around $2,944/month” Perplexity Sonar · DDoS · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azure DDoS Protection, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure DDoS Protection was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cloudflare88 of 9081Not in the top three
AWS Shield87 of 902Not in the top three
Akamai Prolexic65 of 904Not in the top three
Imperva48 of 900Not in the top three
Radware35 of 900Not in the top three
Google Cloud Armor27 of 900Not in the top three
Sucuri17 of 900Not in the top three
Fastly15 of 900Not in the top three
Flowtriq11 of 900Not in the top three
NETSCOUT Arbor11 of 900Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure DDoS Protection. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 90 answers that named Azure DDoS Protection and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cybersecuritynews.com57
flowtriq.com52
cyberpress.org48
cloudminister.com34
gartner.com32
esecurityplanet.com28
geekflare.com25
myrasecurity.com21
expertinsights.com17
comparitech.com14

328 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming Azure DDoS Protection came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Azure DDoS Protection

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Azure DDoS Protection; a claim can dispute any of them.
Azure DDoS 3Azure 2Azure DDoS Network Protection 2Microsoft Azure DDoS Protection 2Azure DDoS (Basic) 1Azure DDoS Basic 1Azure DDoS Basic/Network Protection 1Azure DDoS Infrastructure Protection 1Azure DDoS Protection Basic 1Microsoft Azure DDoS 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure DDoS Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure DDoS Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azure.cn is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack