| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDoS protection | Network and edge | 4% | 2 of 58 | 11% | 62 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDoS | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 2 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cloudflare and AWS Shield Advanced are the top choices due to their balance of cost, ease of use, and comprehensive protection” Mistral Small · DDoS · direct prompt · first choice
“If your entire stack is hosted on Amazon Web Services (EC2, Elastic Load Balancing), AWS Shield is the logical choice.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DDoS · direct prompt · first choice
“If you're on AWS: AWS Shield Advanced (free Standard tier + paid for advanced). Seamless integration but best if heavily cloud-native.” Grok 4.20 · DDoS · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you're AWS-based: AWS Shield and Azure DDoS Protection are the strongest choices inside their respective clouds” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DDoS · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“A Budget Trap to Avoid ... Costs a flat $3,000/month with a 1-year commitment, plus data transfer fees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DDoS · budget prompt · hard negative
“Options to Avoid on a Limited Budget ... $3,000/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DDoS · budget prompt · hard negative
“AWS Shield Standard protects only when used with AWS edge services like CloudFront and Route 53, and Shield Advanced is needed for stronger cost protection” Perplexity Sonar · DDoS · negative prompt · soft negative
“AWS Shield is designed to protect AWS resources ... don't assume the cloud provider's built-in protection covers it.” GPT-6 Luna · DDoS · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 187 of the 200 answers that named AWS Shield and are not a share of its labels.
747 of the 747 domain citations in answers naming AWS Shield came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What AWS Shield's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aws.amazon.com/shield, aws.amazon.com/shield/sla, aws.amazon.com/shield/faqs, aws.amazon.com/shield/pricing, aws.amazon.com/shield/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS Shield's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS Shield, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS Shield by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AWS Shield is among the products AI models recommend first in DDoS protection this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.