AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Airtable · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Airtable

15Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Airtable was named 2 times in Cyber risk quant and 1 other category, where CyberSaint CyberStrong led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cyber risk quant · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Airtable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cyber risk quantificationSecurity operations0%38 of 1160%1under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25%
SaaS management platformsIT operations and endpoint0%29 of 640%1under 10 labels · led by Torii at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Airtable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Airtable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Create a centralized SaaS tracker for applications under 50 people” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS management · budget prompt · alternative
“The Best "Digital Notebook" Option: Airtable or Notion” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Airtable, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Airtable was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Notion7 of 150Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview3 of 151Not among the top eight
Lucidchart3 of 150Not among the top eight
Archi2 of 152Not among the top eight
Credo AI2 of 151Not among the top eight
DigitalOcean Managed Databases2 of 151Not among the top eight
LeanIX2 of 151Not among the top eight
Amazon RDS2 of 150Not among the top eight
Baserow2 of 150Not among the top eight
Cledara2 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Airtable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 15 answers that named Airtable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com6
capterra.com4
reddit.com4
erstudio.com3
ovaledge.com3
thectoclub.com3
atlan.com2
corma.io2
devopsschool.com2
enzuzo.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Airtable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

airtable.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Airtable takes 0% of first choices and CyberSaint CyberStrong takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cyber risk quantification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cyber risk quantification tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
165,000 a month (“airtable”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,461 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 143,237 a month
Searches its site ranks for
11,937 · 1,354 in the top three
Sites linking to it
93,440
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
118+ ads · 118 text · 118 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as FORMAGRID INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 59 in the year, 59 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 38 of 116 in cyber risk quant
Segment leader
25%
CyberSaint CyberStrong
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on airtable.com
10,106
subdomains included
Content
1,950
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,354
Product · Integration
74 · 226
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog70202025-09-29
News or press320undated
Template or tool310undated
Report or ebook164undated
Podcast or video125undated
Webinar or virtual event10642026-10-06
Case study77undated
Comparison64undated
Glossary or explainer49undated
Conference or event33undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on airtable.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page airtable.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Airtable

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Airtable is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Build Enterprise-ready AI Workflows, Apps & Agents
For
teams
Price stated
Pricing airtable.com
Starting price
20 airtable.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get started for free airtable.com
Integrations claimed
5 airtable.com
Certifications
ISOHIPAASOC 2SAML-based single sign-onHIPAA Compliance
Hosting
EuropeanAustralianEuropean data residency
Customers named
Code and TheoryWarner Music GroupRejuvenationWilliams-Sonoma CompanyFlatiron HealthButternut BoxDaily MailDMG Media

What Airtable's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: airtable.com, airtable.com/pricing, airtable.com/platform, airtable.com/customer-stories, airtable.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Airtable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Airtable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Airtable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Airtable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Airtable, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at airtable.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.