Every category where a model named Lucidchart for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Enterprise architecture tools	IT operations and endpoint	0%	103 of 113	50%	6	under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lucidchart yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lucidchart across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Alternatives: Lighter tools like Ardoq or Lucidchart for simpler needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · EA tools · negative prompt · alternative

“Start simple - diagramming tools (Lucidchart) may suffice initially” MiniMax M2.5 · EA tools · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they are *not* enterprise architecture tools because they lack a centralized, relational object repository” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EA tools · negative prompt · hard negative

“you should strictly avoid using these tools as your primary repository” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EA tools · negative prompt · hard negative

“*Drawing tools* (like Lucidchart, Miro, or Visio) are purely visual... you have to manually change it in the other fifty.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EA tools · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lucidchart, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucidchart was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LeanIX16 of 273Not among the top eight

Archi14 of 277Not among the top eight

Ardoq14 of 270Not among the top eight

Miro12 of 270Not among the top eight

Bizzdesign Horizzon11 of 270Not among the top eight

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect9 of 272Not among the top eight

Visio9 of 270Not among the top eight

MEGA HOPEX7 of 270Not among the top eight

SAP LeanIX7 of 270Not among the top eight

Draw.io6 of 270Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lucidchart. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 27 answers that named Lucidchart and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

erstudio.com14

capstera.com11

catio.tech11

g2.com9

ardoq.com8

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com8

ciopages.com8

superblocks.com8

capterra.com7

leanix.net7

No domain is on file for Lucidchart, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

erstudio.com/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools14

capstera.com/knowledge-hub/articles/enterprise-architecture-tools-guide11

catio.tech/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools11

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/10-best-enterprise-arch/1317056948

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/enterprise-architecture-tool8

superblocks.com/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools8

ardoq.com/knowledge-hub/enterprise-architecture-tool7

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-enterprise-architecture-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-comp6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Lucidchart stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 74,000 a month (“lucidchart”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 878 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 103 of 113 in EA tools

Segment leader

25%

SAP LeanIX

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Lucidchart

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lucidchart's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lucidchart, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lucidchart by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Lucidchart is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lucidchart, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.