Every category where a model named AccuKnox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	1%	7 of 70	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Application security posture management	Developer platform	0%	67 of 70	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	145 of 233	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
API security platforms	Security operations	0%	58 of 93	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%
Static application security testing	Developer platform	0%	34 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 36%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, AccuKnox held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · CNAPP · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 27 → 9 of 58

Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 21 → 6 of 68

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 18 of 35

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
CNAPP	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 21 → 7 of 70
ASPM	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 67 of 70, unchanged
AI security	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 145 of 233, unchanged
API security	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 58 of 93, unchanged
SAST	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 34 of 71, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated AccuKnox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. AccuKnox - Most Affordable” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CNAPP · budget prompt · first choice

“AccuKnox offers broad CNAPP coverage, a free plan, and hybrid deployment support.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CNAPP · budget prompt · alternative

“AccuKnox (Ranked top free plan in reviews)... Ideal for startups.” Grok 4.20 · CNAPP · budget prompt · alternative

“AccuKnox (Best for Kubernetes & Zero-Trust Runtime Security)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CNAPP · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ASPM platforms like Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode, OX Security, AccuKnox, and Snyk AppRisk aggregate security findings into a unified posture view; they cannot test a compiled mobile binary” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

“called out as having a significant blind spot” Kimi K2 · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AccuKnox, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AccuKnox was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wiz11 of 200Not among the top eight

Orca Security9 of 200Not among the top eight

Aikido Security8 of 204Not among the top eight

Prisma Cloud7 of 200Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Cloud6 of 203Not among the top eight

Prowler5 of 201Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security5 of 200Not among the top eight

Trivy5 of 200Not among the top eight

Steampipe4 of 200Not among the top eight

OX Security3 of 200Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AccuKnox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named AccuKnox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

accuknox.comYour site15

aikido.dev10

g2.com9

wiz.io9

cyberpress.org8

slashdot.org7

appsecsanta.com6

cycode.com6

itechguides.com6

orca.security6

Sixty-seven of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming AccuKnox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aikido.dev/blog/top-cloud-native-application-protection-platforms-cnapp7

cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-25

wiz.io/academy/cloud-security/open-source-cnapp-tools5

accuknox.com/blog/cnapp-vendors4

cycode.com/blog/best-application-secuirty-posture-management-tools3

fidelissecurity.com/threatgeek/cloud-security/top-cnapp-vendors3

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools3

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-10-cnapp-solutions-20263

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

accuknox.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, AccuKnox takes 1% of first choices and Wiz takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “cnapp”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “cnapps”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 320 a month (“accuknox”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,717 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,065 · 26 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,517
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 70 in CNAPP

Segment leader

37%

Wiz

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 20 answers
Its own site cited: in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on accuknox.com

3,879

subdomains included

Content

719

counted in the table below

Documentation

507

Product · Integration

82 · 4

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	274	undated	CNAPP, CSPM
Podcast or video	165	undated	CNAPP, SAST
Comparison	70	undated	CNAPP, CSPM
News or press	69	undated	CNAPP, SIEM
Conference or event	45	undated	SIEM
Report or ebook	41	undated	CNAPP, CSPM
Webinar or virtual event	23	undated	CNAPP, SAST
Case study	16	undated
Glossary or explainer	9	undated	CNAPP
Template or tool	7	undated	CNAPP

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page accuknox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow AccuKnox

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AccuKnox is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: #1 AI-Powered Zero Trust CNAPP
accuknox.com
For: Organizations serious about moving AI into production
accuknox.com
Price stated: Get a custom quote. accuknox.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free Trial accuknox.com
Integrations claimed: 30 accuknox.com · 50 accuknox.com/platform pages disagree
Certifications: AVIDDigital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act – IndiaAPRA 234 STANDARDAIIDAWS CIS Benchmark v1.4.0AWS CIS Benchmark v1.5.0CIS Benchmark v2.0.0AWS CIS Benchmark v2.0.0
Customers named: IDT TelecomHumata HealthPrudentTibleSonestaFederal GovernmentTop #3 Indian Public Sector BankGolan Ben-Oni
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, hosting

What AccuKnox's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: accuknox.com, accuknox.com/pricing, accuknox.com/compliance, accuknox.com/platform, accuknox.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AccuKnox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AccuKnox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AccuKnox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where AccuKnox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name AccuKnox, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.