Breach and attack simulation for small business buyers
Asked as “breach and attack simulation platform”, and as “security control validation tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 61 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
13%
Contested · Infection Monkey 11%
13Vanta11Infection Monkey10AttackIQ Flex66others
13% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Cymulate vs AttackIQ FlexCymulate vs AttackIQCymulate vs Horizon3.ai NodeZeroPicus Security Validation Platform vs NodeZeroPicus Security Validation Platform vs PenteraPicus Security Validation Platform vs AttackIQ FlexPicus Security Validation Platform vs AttackIQPicus Security Validation Platform vs Horizon3.ai NodeZeroNodeZero vs PenteraNodeZero vs AttackIQ FlexNodeZero vs AttackIQNodeZero vs Horizon3.ai NodeZeroPentera vs AttackIQ FlexPentera vs AttackIQPentera vs Horizon3.ai NodeZeroAttackIQ Flex vs AttackIQAttackIQ Flex vs Horizon3.ai NodeZeroAttackIQ vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01I02
03
04
05
06
07N08
09
10
11M12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Vanta13%
Vanta13%02Infection Monkey11%
03AttackIQ Flex10%
AttackIQ Flex10%04Cymulate10%
Cymulate10%05Picus Security Validation Platform8%
Picus Security Validation Platform8%06Horizon3.ai NodeZero8%
Horizon3.ai NodeZero8%07OpenBAS7%
OpenBAS7%08NodeZero5%
09AttackIQ3%
AttackIQ3%10Pentera2%
Pentera2%11SafeBreach2%
SafeBreach2%12Mandiant Security Validation0%
What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SafeBreach63%
26 of 41 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“positioned as a more advanced, enterprise-scale BAS platform, and it appears repeatedly in enterprise-focused recommendations rather than small-business ones” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Cymulate35%
18 of 52 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“the BAS platforms to **avoid or approach cautiously** are usually the **enterprise-heavy, high-cost, and resource-intensive** ones: **Cymulate**” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
AttackIQ50%
16 of 32 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“this platform is positioned as an enterprise-grade solution. Reviews indicate it is geared towards organizations with complex security stacks.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Pentera70%
19 of 27 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Key platforms to **avoid or approach with extreme caution**... **Pentera**: Starts around $75,000/year... overkill and costly for SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1137 links across 227 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
53 answers · 54 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Picus Security44 answers · 76 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Guideflow40 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G235 answers · 54 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SourceForge28 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FitGap27 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Adaptive Security21 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
52 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 7 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best breach and attack simulation platform”, “breach and attack simulation platform”, “breach and attack simulation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta vanta.com | 13% | 500 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | ||
| AttackIQ attackiq.com AttackIQ Flex 10%, AttackIQ 3% | 13% | 124 | 1,000 | 9 | 1,414 | 11 | ||
| Infection Monkey | 11% | 880 | 11 | |||||
| Cymulate cymulate.com | 10% | 163 | 720 | 16 | 16,407 | 3 | ||
| Picus Security Validation Platform picussecurity.com | 8% | 148 | 20 | 0 | 81,880 | $1,031 | 25 | 3 |
| Horizon3.ai horizon3.ai Horizon3.ai NodeZero 8% | 8% | 36 | 40 | 1 | 7,505 company | $431 | 7 | |
| OpenBAS openbas.io | 7% | 18 | 90 | 2 | ||||
| NodeZero | 5% | 720 | 15 | |||||
| Drata drata.com | 5% | 390 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | ||
| Validato | 3% | 30 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, picussecurity.com, sourceforge.net, startupstash.com). The first result for “best breach and attack simulation platform” is sourceforge.net.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best breach and attack simulation platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security control validation tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top breach and attack simulation platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best breach and attack simulation platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a breach and attack simulation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which breach and attack simulation platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cymulateagainst: SafeBreachno first choiceChangedBreachLock, Cymulateagainst: AttackIQ, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformInfection Monkeyagainst: NodeZerono first choiceagainst: BreachLock
One alternative
BreachLockOne alternative
CalderaFour alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, BreachLock, MITRE Caldera, OWASP ZAPGPT-5.4 miniAttackIQ FlexAttackIQ FlexHeldAttackIQ, Cymulateagainst: SafeBreachAttackIQ Flexno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformTwo alternatives
AttackIQ, CymulateOne alternative
DefendifyGemini 3.5 FlashCymulate, Horizon3.ai NodeZeroagainst: AttackIQ, Pentera, SafeBreachDrata, VantaChangedagainst: AttackIQ, SafeBreachCymulateHorizon3.ai NodeZero, Infection Monkeyagainst: Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreachHorizon3.ai NodeZeroagainst: AttackIQ, SafeBreachagainst: AttackIQ, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SCYTHE, SafeBreach
One alternative
Picus Security Validation PlatformFour alternatives
Cymulate, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Infection Monkey, Vonahi Security vPenTestThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Picus Security Validation PlatformThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, OpenBAS, Picus Security Validation PlatformFour alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey, Picus Security Validation Platform, Vonahi Security vPenTestPerplexity SonarCymulatePicus Security Validation Platform, VantaChangedCymulateagainst: Akamai Guardicore SegmentationOpenBASno first choiceagainst: Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, OpenBAS, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
OpenBAS, Picus Security Validation PlatformOne alternative
SafeBreachFive alternatives
AttackIQ, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach, XM CyberOne alternative
Picus Security Validation PlatformGrok 4.1 FastHorizon3.ai NodeZeroagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreachVantaChangedagainst: Lynis, OpenSCAPAttackIQ, Picus Security Validation Platformagainst: Pentera, Rapid7, XM CyberMITRE Calderaagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Picus Security Validation PlatformAttackIQ, Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platformagainst: SafeBreachagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreach
Four alternatives
Infection Monkey, Picus Security Validation Platform, Sophos PhishThreat, ValidatoThree alternatives
Drata, Secureframe, SprintoTwo alternatives
Cymulate, SafeBreachThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
BreachLockMistral SmallOpenBAS, RidgeBotPicus Security Validation PlatformChangedNodeZeroNodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platformagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, Penterano first choiceagainst: AttackIQ Flex, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Cymulate, PenteraThree alternatives
Sprinto, Validato, VantaTwo alternatives
OpenBAS, Picus Security Validation PlatformDeepSeek V4 FlashAttackIQ Flexagainst: Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreachDrata, VantaChangedagainst: Cymulate, PenteraCymulateInfection Monkeyagainst: NodeZeroInfection Monkeyagainst: Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreachagainst: AttackIQ, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Picus Security Validation PlatformOne alternative
AttackIQ FlexThree alternatives
AttackIQ, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachTwo alternatives
Cymulate, XM CyberFour alternatives
AttackIQ, NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform, Sophos PhishThreatLlama 4 MaverickOpenBAS, PenteraValidatoChangedno first choiceAqua Security Trivy, NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platformno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cymulate, Picus Autonomous Exposure Validation PlatformQwen 3.7 FlashHorizon3.ai NodeZeroagainst: Cymulate, NetSPI, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachDrata, VantaChangedagainst: Picus Security Validation PlatformHorizon3.ai NodeZeroBreachLockagainst: Cymulate, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Intruder, OpenBASOne alternative
SecureframeTwo alternatives
OpenBAS, Picus Security Validation PlatformThree alternatives
Infection Monkey, MITRE Caldera, NodeZeroKimi K2FirstStrike, Validatoagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachVantaChangedAttackIQ Flexagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreach, XM CyberInfection Monkeyagainst: AttackIQ, NodeZero, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platformno first choiceagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Horizon3.ai NodeZero, NodeZeroThree alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Drata, SecureframeThree alternatives
Cymulate, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Picus Security Validation PlatformTwo alternatives
Cymulate, XM CyberGLM 4.7 FlashXSafeBreachBarrionChangedNodeZeroAttackIQno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Three alternatives
AttackIQ, Cymulate, Picus Security Validation PlatformTwo alternatives
ComplySci, VantaTwo alternatives
OpenBAS, Picus Security Validation PlatformOne alternative
Picus Security Validation PlatformMiniMax M2.5Cymulate, ThreatSimCymulateChangedAttackIQ Flex, Infection Monkeyagainst: Cymulate, SafeBreachInfection Monkey, OpenBASno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
AttackIQ, SafeBreachTwo alternatives
Validato, VantaTwo alternatives
Defendify, Sophos PhishThreatThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, AttackIQ Flex, CymulateGPT-6 LunaAttackIQ FlexVantaChangedAttackIQ Flexagainst: Atomic Red TeamInfection Monkeyno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ
Two alternatives
Cymulate, Picus Security Validation PlatformOne alternative
AttackIQThree alternatives
Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachTwo alternatives
Atomic Red Team, MITRE CalderaOne alternative
Atomic Red TeamMuse Glimmer 30BNodeZeroagainst: CymulateVantaChangedCymulateAttackIQ Flex, Horizon3.ai – NodeZerono first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Picus Security Validation PlatformThree alternatives
Drata, Pentera, SecureframeFive alternatives
AttackIQ, NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach, XM CyberTwo alternatives
Cymulate SMB program, First StrikeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:26 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:45 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 22 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 16 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:33 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 1 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:56 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:48 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 31 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 9 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:01 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:49 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:56 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:36 | yes | 22 | 129 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:51 | yes | 9 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:33 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:07 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:57 | yes | 27 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:48 | yes | 25 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:46 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 9 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 19 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 24 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:35 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:29 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 17 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:43 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:50 | yes | 21 | 76 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:48 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:46 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:07 | yes | 12 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:27 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 16 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:52 | yes | 23 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:06 | yes | 16 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 2 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Horizon3.ai read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Mandiant read as Mandiant Security Validation
Picus read as Picus Security Validation Platform
Picus Platform read as Picus Security Validation Platform
Picus Security read as Picus Security Validation Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
AttackIQ Platform
AttackIQ Ready!
Barrion
ComplySci
CylanceCheck
Cymulate SMB program
Horizon3.ai – NodeZero
Lynis
PTG Pilot Program
Picus Complete Security Validation
ThreatSim
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.