AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › BAS › AttackIQ vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Breach and attack simulation · October 2026 Edition

AttackIQ vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero

Zero of fourteen models named AttackIQ first on the direct prompt; zero named Horizon3.ai NodeZero. AttackIQ was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Horizon3.ai NodeZero by six and AttackIQ carries 38 labels and Horizon3.ai NodeZero 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

AttackIQ

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Horizon3.ai NodeZero

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate24%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels3812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, AttackIQ reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cymulate was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Cymulate vs AttackIQ · Cymulate vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero · Picus Security Validation Platform vs AttackIQ

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the breach and attack simulation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AttackIQFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHorizon3.ai NodeZero
Direct001 against AttackIQ
Paraphrase10
Comparative20
Budget-constrained001 against AttackIQ · 1 against Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Scale-constrained01
Negative007 against AttackIQ
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, AttackIQ and Horizon3.ai NodeZero were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 131 answers naming AttackIQ and the 37 naming Horizon3.ai NodeZero. In those answers Horizon3.ai NodeZero took the first choice six times and AttackIQ two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where AttackIQ and Horizon3.ai NodeZero stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
AttackIQ Horizon3.ai NodeZero first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AttackIQ on the left and Horizon3.ai NodeZero on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where AttackIQ and Horizon3.ai NodeZero stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cymulate alternatives: AttackIQ, Pentera
Gemini 3.5 FlashPicus Security Validation Platform alternatives: Cymulate, Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Grok 4.1 FastCymulate alternatives: AttackIQ, NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform
DeepSeek V4 FlashCymulate alternatives: AttackIQ, Picus Security Validation Platform
GLM 4.7 FlashXNodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform alternatives: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach
MiniMax M2.5Cymulate, NodeZero alternatives: AttackIQ

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCymulate alternatives: Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform
Perplexity SonarPicus Security Validation Platform alternatives: Cymulate, NodeZero
Mistral SmallCymulate alternatives: Weseth
Llama 4 MaverickValidato alternatives: Weseth
Qwen 3.7 FlashNodeZero alternatives: Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform
Kimi K2NodeZero alternatives: Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform
GPT-6 LunaCymulate alternatives: AttackIQ Flex, Picus Security Validation Platform
Muse Glimmer 30BCymulate alternatives: NodeZero, Picus Security Validation Platform

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Horizon3.ai NodeZero leads by five points.
Horizon3.ai NodeZero8%#6 of 12
AttackIQ3%#9 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
AttackIQ2%#6 of 9
Horizon3.ai NodeZero2%#7 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: AttackIQ leads at enterprise.
AttackIQ20%#3 of 7
Horizon3.ai NodeZero0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about AttackIQ

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid: AttackIQ and SafeBreach tend to be priced higher and are better suited for larger enterprises” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“some reviewers noted it might not be suitable for larger companies due to potential scalability issues or management complexity” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Widely respected for its alignment with the MITRE ATT&CK framework, but criticized for having a steeper learning curve.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd usually recommend AttackIQ as the best all-around security control validation / breach-and-attack simulation tool.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. AttackIQ - Focus: Continuous security validation and threat-informed defense.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“start with AttackIQ for adversary emulation” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Horizon3.ai NodeZero

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“more polished but exceed "limited budget" ... Avoid them unless you have funding.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“opt for "automated security validation" or highly-automated BAS vendors (e.g., Cymulate, Pentera, Picus, or Horizon3)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“often cited as a strong BAS option for startups and small businesses due to its 30-day free trial and affordable pricing options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
“If you want to replace expensive manual penetration tests ... choose Horizon3.ai NodeZero” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.