AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Cloud and infrastructure › Cloud hosting › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Cloud hosting for enterprise buyers

Asked as “cloud hosting provider”, and as “infrastructure-as-a-service cloud”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
42%
42Amazon Web Services38Microsoft Azure06Azure14others

42% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▼−14Since September 2026: 57% → 43%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Amazon Web Services held the lead, −14 points on 57%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Amazon Web Services42%13%68endorsed leader▼−14Since September 2026: 57% → 43%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.57% → 43%
02Microsoft Azure38%4%48endorsed leader▲+13Since September 2026: 27% → 40%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 40%
03Azure6%35%17criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
04Oracle Cloud Infrastructure4%24%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 5%
05DigitalOcean Droplets2%62%13criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Alibaba Cloud Lab in the set0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
07IBM0%19%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
06Google Cloud Lab in the set0%13%62accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Cloud is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Alibaba Cloud is made by Alibaba, whose model Qwen 3.7 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
A03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Amazon Web Services42%
02Microsoft Azure38%
03Azure6%
04Oracle Cloud Infrastructure4%
05DigitalOcean Droplets2%
06Google Cloud0%
07IBM0%
08Alibaba Cloud0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
DigitalOcean Droplets
62%
8 of 13 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Some cloud hosting providers that may not be suitable for large enterprises include DigitalOcean, which can scale but may not match the enterprise-grade features” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Amazon Web Services
13%
9 of 68 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“The top cloud hosting companies for large enterprises include AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud... However, these providers can introduce layers of operational and financial complexity.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Google Cloud
13%
8 of 62 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“not a hyperscaler like AWS or Google Cloud, because those are typically **pay-as-you-go** and can be harder to forecast” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
24%
8 of 33 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“it still faces criticism for support responsiveness ... console usability, and occasional abrupt billing disputes” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1005 links across 416 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 22 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Atlantic.Net33 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · DigitalOcean16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 20 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Amazon12 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Hostinger12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Oracle10 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Bluehost10 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · CloudZero10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cloud hosting provider”, “cloud hosting provider”, “cloud hosting providers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Amazon aws.amazon.com
Amazon Web Services 42%
42%164151,000,0001,380,9399,238,321$20,4762
Microsoft azure.microsoft.com
Microsoft Azure 38%
38%1072,240,000403,1361,848,766$6,123
Azure6%301,00047,904
Oracle parent site
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 4%
4%48450,00066,611
Rackspace Technology rackspace.com2%4226,4220
Microsoft Azure with an Enterprise Agreement2%
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Windows 365 2%
2%162,240,000403,136
Cloudflare cloudflare.com2%430550,00010,8974,995,413111
DigitalOcean parent site
DigitalOcean Droplets 2%
2%10574,000942
Google Cloud google.com0%226165,0007,5961,800,358,416$465,94451

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aws.amazon.com, digitalocean.com, elementor.com, hostinger.com). The first result for “best cloud hosting provider” is wp101.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best cloud hosting provider for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which infrastructure-as-a-service cloud would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade cloud hosting providers and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cloud hosting provider for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a cloud hosting provider. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cloud hosting providers should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Amazon Web Services
One alternativeMicrosoft Azure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
Two alternativesDigitalOcean Droplets, Google Cloud
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniAmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Microsoft Azure
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Azure
Three alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Microsoft AzureHeld
Three alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Microsoft Windows 365, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Six alternativesAkamai Connected Cloud, Amazon WorkSpaces, Equinix, Flexential, OVHcloud, Rackspace
against: Amazon Web Services, Azure Virtual Desktop, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Connected Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, Bluehost, DigitalOcean Droplets, GoDaddy, Heroku, HostGator, Hostinger, Huawei, OVHcloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Rackspace, Tencent Cloud, Vultr
Perplexity SonarAmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, NTT DATA
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft AzureHeld
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Six alternativesAlibaba Cloud, Atlantic.Net, Google Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
against: Rackspace
DigitalOcean Droplets
Two alternativesHostinger, Microsoft Azure
against: Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud, DigitalOcean Droplets, Hetzner, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Rackspace, Vultr
Grok 4.1 FastAmazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web ServicesHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
against: Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
Three alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Two alternativesAzure, Google Cloud
no first choice
Four alternativesAmazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
against: Akamai Connected Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, DigitalOcean Droplets, Google Cloud, OVHcloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Mistral SmallAmazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Amazon Web ServicesHeldAmazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services, Azure
One alternativeOpenMetal
against: IBM
no first choiceagainst: Cloudflare, DigitalOcean Droplets, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Azure
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Microsoft AzureHeld
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
no first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean Droplets, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Tencent Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickAmazon Web Services, Rackspace TechnologyAmazon Web ServicesChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Azureno first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Azure, DigitalOcean Droplets, Google Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Microsoft Azure
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Connected Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, Amazon Web Services, Azure, DigitalOcean Droplets, Google Cloud, Hetzner, OVHcloud, Tencent Cloud, Vultr
Kimi K2Amazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Microsoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
against: Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Microsoft Azure with an Enterprise Agreementagainst: Amazon Web Services, Google Cloudno first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Nirvanix
GLM 4.7 FlashXno first choiceMicrosoft AzureChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
Four alternativesAlibaba Cloud, Google Cloud, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
no first choiceno first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Azure, DigitalOcean Droplets, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Vultr
MiniMax M2.5Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
One alternativeGoogle Cloud
Microsoft AzureChanged
One alternativeAmazon Web Services
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesGoogle Cloud, IBM, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
no first choice
One alternativeInMotion Hosting
no first choiceagainst: Azure, GCP
GPT-6 LunaAmazon Web Services
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Microsoft AzureChanged
One alternativeAmazon Web Services
Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Three alternativesAlibaba Cloud, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Azure
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure
Muse Glimmer 30BAmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Liquid Web
Amazon Web ServicesChanged
Two alternativesGoogle Cloud, Microsoft
Amazon Web Services
Four alternativesAzure, Google Cloud, IBM, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Azure, Cloudflare
Two alternativesAmazon Web Services, Google Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud, Amazon Web Services, Azure, GCP, Hostinger, Huawei, SiteGround, Tencent Cloud
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:22yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:02yes56 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:14yes1122 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:00yes203 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:10yes246 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:54yes148 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:12yes2429 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:58yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:31no033 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:49yes1522 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:52yes24206 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:18yes720 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:50yes211 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:51yes1523 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:05no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:35yes59 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:51yes522 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:37yes204 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:21yes145 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:19yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:06yes2552 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:00yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:51no025 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:54no019 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:55yes2081 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:04no042 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:31yes210 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:47yes1520 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:16yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:24yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:22yes1025 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:47yes184 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:17yes156 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:45yes109 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:42yes1943 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:37yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:02yes1551 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:19yes1525 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:44no031 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:14yes517 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:41yes1118 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:56yes1325 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:31yes199 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:38yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:47yes1727 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:10yes313 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:19yes248 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:50yes157 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:47yes2436 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:56yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:28no030 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:28yes1822 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:40yes12127 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:56yes2355 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:03yes212 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:01yes2437 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:53yes1811 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:45no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:35no013 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:37yes206 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:31yes207 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:08no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:05yes2536 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:00yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:51yes1028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:28no025 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:21yes1547 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:47yes517 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:14yes629 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:27yes1521 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:29yes198 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:12no06 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:22yes725 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:54yes206 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:52yes2513 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:14yes189 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:34yes2573 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:53yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:01no034 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:47yes2526 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:10yes2556 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:48yes1023 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:30yes319 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:57yes2538 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS read as Amazon Web Services
AWS (Amazon Web Services) read as Amazon Web Services
Akamai read as Akamai Connected Cloud
DigitalOcean read as DigitalOcean Droplets
Linode read as Akamai Connected Cloud
Linode (Akamai) read as Akamai Connected Cloud
Oracle read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud (OCI) read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure – OCI read as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Unresolved, counted raw
ClearDATA
IT AI Index
Microsoft Azure with an Enterprise Agreement (EA)
NTT DATA
Nirvanix
Salesforce Cloud
Unite AI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← FinOpsCSPM →