AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Zendesk for Employee Service · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Zendesk for Employee Service

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zendesk for Employee Service was named 1 time in Enterprise AI, where ChatGPT led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In enterprise ai · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zendesk for Employee Service for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise AI assistantsData platform0%88 of 1450%1under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zendesk for Employee Service yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zendesk for Employee Service across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Zendesk for Employee Service if your company is already centered on ITSM/HRSM” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise AI · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zendesk for Employee Service, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zendesk for Employee Service was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ChatGPT1 of 21Not among the top eight
Workativ1 of 21Not among the top eight
Moveworks1 of 20Not among the top eight
ServiceNow Now Assist1 of 20Not among the top eight
Siit.io1 of 20Not among the top eight
Tidio1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zendesk for Employee Service. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Zendesk for Employee Service and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eesel.ai2
g2.com2
analyticsinsight.net1
biz.heraldcorp.com1
bland.ai1
chatbase.co1
chatbot.com1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1
coworker.ai1
guideflow.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Zendesk for Employee Service came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zendesk.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zendesk for Employee Service takes 0% of first choices and ChatGPT takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “enterprise ai assistant”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “enterprise ai assistants”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 5,365,445 a month
Searches its site ranks for
665,842 · 40,244 in the top three
Sites linking to it
343,954
Paid Google search
12 searches its ads show for, about 932 clicks and $16,181 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
63+ ads · 63 text · 63 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as Depop Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 2 in the year, 61 before. 57 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 88 of 145 in Enterprise AI
Segment leader
25%
ChatGPT
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zendesk.com
10,131
subdomains included
Content
2,565
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,313
Product · Integration
39 · 731
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,365322026-09-18
News or press47342026-09-14
Case study356102026-09-23
Comparison11402025-09-21
Report or ebook10212026-09-10
Glossary or explainer5972026-09-25
Conference or event4812026-09-18
Podcast or video3802026-06-01
Webinar or virtual event502025-06-13
Template or tool502026-06-22

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zendesk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Zendesk for Employee Service

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zendesk for Employee Service's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zendesk for Employee Service, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zendesk for Employee Service by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zendesk for Employee Service is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zendesk for Employee Service, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zendesk.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.