Index › Products › Wiki.js · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Wiki.js

14Judge labels

1First choices

4Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wiki.js was named 5 times in IT documentation, where Hudu led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business25 of 103

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 92

under the label threshold

Enterprise90 of 107

under the label threshold

In it documentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wiki.js for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
IT documentation	IT operations and endpoint	2%	11 of 92	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Hudu at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wiki.js yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wiki.js across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a limited budget, Wiki.js and BookStack are the top choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IT documentation · budget prompt · first choice

“Self-host preferred (cheapest long-term, full control): BookStack or Wiki.js.” Grok 4.1 Fast · IT documentation · budget prompt · alternative

“Zero budget, have technical staff | BookStack or Wiki.js” Kimi K2 · IT documentation · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Developers / Modern UX” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IT documentation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Open-source projects like BookStack, Wiki.js, or ITFlow... they come with a distinct warning label” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IT documentation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wiki.js, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wiki.js was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BookStack12 of 145Not among the top eight

Notion11 of 144Not among the top eight

Confluence9 of 142Not among the top eight

Hudu6 of 142Not among the top eight

IT Glue6 of 140Not among the top eight

Outline6 of 140Not among the top eight

DokuWiki4 of 140Not among the top eight

MediaWiki4 of 140Not among the top eight

Atlassian Confluence3 of 140Not among the top eight

Nuclino3 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wiki.js. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 14 answers that named Wiki.js and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ones.com7

nuclino.com6

docmost.com5

ferndesk.com5

pageloop.ai5

bookstackapp.com4

comparitech.com4

startup-house.com4

us.fitgap.com4

atlassian.com3

No domain is on file for Wiki.js, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

pageloop.ai/blog/best-it-documentation-software-tools5

bookstackapp.com/about/open-source-documentation-software4

comparitech.com/net-admin/best-it-documentation-tools4

docmost.com/blog/self-hosted-documentation-tools4

ferndesk.com/blog/best-it-documentation-software4

startup-house.com/blog/modern-technical-documentation-tools4

us.fitgap.com/search/it-documentation-software/small-business4

costbench.com/best/it-documentation-for-small-business3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Wiki.js stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 2,900 a month (“wiki.js”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 36 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 92 in IT documentation

Segment leader

17%

Hudu

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Wiki.js

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wiki.js's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wiki.js, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wiki.js by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Wiki.js is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wiki.js, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.