| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT documentation | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 12 of 92 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Hudu at 17% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MediaWiki and DokuWiki are the top choices due to their open-source nature and lack of licensing fees” Mistral Small · IT documentation · budget prompt · first choice
“Other Strong Free Alternatives: DokuWiki | No database (flat files), plugins for diagrams/auth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · IT documentation · budget prompt · alternative
“Open source/self-hosted | BookStack, DokuWiki, Outline | No vendor lock-in, free forever” Kimi K2 · IT documentation · negative prompt · alternative
“Choose DokuWiki if you want the simplest possible setup” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IT documentation · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Not recommended for critical IT documentation, especially as your organization grows beyond early-stage startup status.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IT documentation · negative prompt · hard negative
“require devops expertise to secure/maintain. No out-of-box IT features” Grok 4.1 Fast · IT documentation · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named DokuWiki and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for DokuWiki, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DokuWiki's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DokuWiki, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DokuWiki by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: