| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 54 of 54 | 58% | 12 | criticized challenger |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 98 of 99 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Strongly Avoid or High Caution... High false positives blocking legit apps, integration struggles post-acquisitions, premium pricing without matching value” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Broadcom-owned tools (Carbon Black, Symantec, VMware Carbon Black) — recurring bugs plus high risk of price hikes and deprioritization.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“"I would probably recommend against Carbon Black" and "stay away from cb"” Mistral Small · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Do not view Carbon Black as a foundational platform for new deployments” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 28 answers that named VMware Carbon Black and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy of the seventy domain citations in answers naming VMware Carbon Black came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VMware Carbon Black's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VMware Carbon Black, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vmware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.