IT AI Index
Index Vendors › VMware Carbon Black · September 2026 Edition
VMware · 2 categories · Ranked

VMware Carbon Black

28Judge labels
0First choices
17Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in EDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 54 of 54 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 58% of its 12 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In edr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named VMware Carbon Black for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Endpoint detection and responseSecurity operations0%54 of 5458%12criticized challenger
Endpoint protectionIT operations and endpoint0%98 of 99100%3under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for VMware Carbon Black yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated VMware Carbon Black across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00022
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00123
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Strongly Avoid or High Caution... High false positives blocking legit apps, integration struggles post-acquisitions, premium pricing without matching value” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Broadcom-owned tools (Carbon Black, Symantec, VMware Carbon Black) — recurring bugs plus high risk of price hikes and deprioritization.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“"I would probably recommend against Carbon Black" and "stay away from cb"” Mistral Small · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative
“Do not view Carbon Black as a foundational platform for new deployments” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EDR · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as VMware Carbon Black, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VMware Carbon Black was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CrowdStrike Falcon20 of 287Not in the top three
SentinelOne Singularity20 of 284Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint18 of 283Not in the top three
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR13 of 280Not in the top three
Sophos Intercept X10 of 280Not in the top three
Trend Micro9 of 280Not in the top three
CrowdStrike6 of 281Not in the top three
Trellix EDR6 of 280Not in the top three
Huntress Managed EDR5 of 281Not in the top three
Bitdefender GravityZone5 of 280Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VMware Carbon Black. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 28 answers that named VMware Carbon Black and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as VMware Carbon Black

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as VMware Carbon Black; a claim can dispute any of them.
Carbon Black 4VMware Carbon Black (Broadcom) 2Broadcom Carbon Black 1Carbon Black (VMware) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VMware Carbon Black's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VMware Carbon Black, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vmware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack