Every category where a model named Uptycs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cloud security posture management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	12 of 53	0%	10	accepted challenger
Cloud-native application protection	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	19 of 57	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	44 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aqua Security at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uptycs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uptycs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	3
Mistral Small	3	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for mid-market organizations wanting a unified security data platform covering both cloud posture and endpoints” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CSPM · direct prompt · alternative

“Uptycs - A unified CNAPP ... offers CSPM, CIEM, and endpoint security, and is suitable for mid-market organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · CSPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Suitable if you need unified coverage from laptops to cloud, combining CSPM with other security capabilities.” Mistral Small · CSPM · direct prompt · alternative

“Tenable Cloud Security / Uptycs — Often recommended specifically for mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CSPM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uptycs, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uptycs was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wiz22 of 2612Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender for Cloud20 of 267Not in the top three

Orca Security14 of 261Not in the top three

Prisma Cloud14 of 260Not in the top three

Tenable Cloud Security13 of 260Not in the top three

Prowler9 of 262Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security8 of 260Not in the top three

Sysdig8 of 260Not in the top three

Upwind7 of 260Not in the top three

Aikido Security6 of 263Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uptycs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Uptycs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org24

gbhackers.com21

cybersecuritynews.com16

cloudaware.com13

expertinsights.com12

orca.security9

complyjet.com8

aikido.dev7

decryptiondigest.com7

azure.microsoft.com6

123 of the 123 domain citations in answers naming Uptycs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/cspm-tools-by-business-size-214

cloudaware.com/blog/top-cloud-security-posture-management-vendors13

gbhackers.com/best-cspm-compared11

cyberpress.org/cnapp-platforms-by-business-size-210

gbhackers.com/best-cnapp-compared9

complyjet.com/blog/best-cspm-tools8

cybersecuritynews.com/best-cspm-tools8

orca.security/resources/blog/best-cspm-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uptycs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uptycs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uptycs.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.