Every category where a model named runZero for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	15 of 104	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for runZero yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated runZero across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels6

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have fewer than 100 assets and want standard IT/OT/External visibility for free, sign up for runZero Community Edition.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASM · budget prompt · alternative

“Excellent if you want to combine internal asset discovery (CAASM) with external attack surface discovery (EASM)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASM · scale prompt · alternative

“free for up to 100 assets, making it the best no-cost option if your environment is small enough” Perplexity Sonar · ASM · budget prompt · alternative

“Start with Intruder's free tier or runZero's Community Edition” MiniMax M2.5 · ASM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as runZero, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and runZero was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Intruder16 of 219Not in the top three

Detectify12 of 210Not in the top three

CyCognito11 of 211Not in the top three

Cortex Xpanse9 of 210Not in the top three

Censys ASM7 of 210Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management7 of 210Not in the top three

Attaxion6 of 211Not in the top three

HostedScan4 of 210Not in the top three

Aikido Security3 of 210Not in the top three

Tenable3 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named runZero. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 21 answers that named runZero and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberbench.net12

pickmysoft.com12

g2.com11

attaxion.com10

synack.com9

upguard.com8

thewearify.com7

circleid.com6

geekflare.com6

runzero.comYour site6

Eighty-one of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming runZero came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberbench.net/blog/best-easm-platforms-mid-market-202612

pickmysoft.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-software12

g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management/small-business10

synack.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-tools9

attaxion.com/top-external-attack-surface-management-vendors8

upguard.com/blog/best-attack-surface-management-software-solutions8

thewearify.com/attack-surface-monitoring-tools7

circleid.com/posts/detectify-vs-intruder-external-attack-surface-management-on-a-budget6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as runZero

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as runZero; a claim can dispute any of them.

runZero Community Edition 2RunZero (Community Edition) 1runZero (Community Edition) 1runZero Community 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when runZero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as runZero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at runzero.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.