IT AI Index

Index › Products › UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC

6Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC was named 3 times in AI SOC agents, where Dropzone AI led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business57 of 93

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise25 of 95

under the label threshold

In ai soc agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI SOC agents	Security operations	4%	7 of 104	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels2

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC offers the best balance of comprehensive coverage, transparent pricing, and human support.” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · first choice

“Radiant Security and UnderDefense are the top recommendations for most organizations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · first choice

“Choose UnderDefense if your company faces compliance requirements” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Torq3 of 60Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Charlotte AI2 of 60Not among the top eight

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM2 of 60Not among the top eight

Radiant Security2 of 60Not among the top eight

Arctic Wolf1 of 61Not among the top eight

Huntress Managed EDR1 of 61Not among the top eight

Charlotte AI / Agentic SOAR1 of 60Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon1 of 60Not among the top eight

Darktrace AI1 of 60Not among the top eight

Dropzone AI1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

underdefense.comYour site6

checkthat.ai4

g2.com3

startupstash.com3

d3security.com2

github.com2

intezer.com2

swimlane.com2

aiagentsquare.com1

aws.amazon.com1

Twenty of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

startupstash.com/best-ai-soc-tools3

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-mid-market3

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-smb3

underdefense.com/blog/best-ai-soc-providers3

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-security-operations-center-solutions2

d3security.com/blog/ai-soc-platforms-20262

g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-ai-soc-agents-platforms-for-enterprise-security-teams2

github.com/volod-k/agentic-ai-soc-knowledge-base/blob/main/research/how-to-evaluate-vendor2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

underdefense.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC takes 4% of first choices and Dropzone AI takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai soc agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai soc agents”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 11,823 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,493 · 127 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,102
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

40 ads · 37 text, 3 image · 10 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as Underdefense LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 26 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 104 in AI SOC agents

Segment leader

24%

Dropzone AI

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 6 answers
Its own site cited: in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on underdefense.com

670

subdomains included

Content

531

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

10 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	405	59	2026-09-29	SIEM, MDR
Comparison	48	8	2026-08-30	MDR, SIEM
Report or ebook	22	0	2025-12-10
Webinar or virtual event	15	1	2026-09-09	EDR, Compliance automation
Template or tool	15	2	2026-07-16	SIEM
Case study	13	2	2026-08-20	SIEM, MDR
Conference or event	5	1	2026-09-22
Glossary or explainer	5	0	2026-03-11	EDR, SIEM
Podcast or video	3	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Best managed cybersecurity services blog
2026-09-23How the best socs spend less time on alerts and more on judgment blog
2026-09-22Cybersecurity events 2026 the 14 conferences still ahead this year conference or event
2026-09-10How aitm phishing bypasses mfa and why phishing resistant mfa would have stopped it blog
2026-09-092027 security operating model webinar webinar or virtual event
2026-08-31Why is my siem generating too many false positives blog

Events in person

Upcoming

October 6, 2026 to October 8, 2026SecTorMetro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto, Canada · attends
October 7, 2026 to October 9, 2026Wild West Hackin’ FestDeadwood, United States · attends
October 11, 2026 to October 15, 2026InfoSec WorldGaylord Palms Resort & Convention Center, Orlando, United States · attends
October 13, 2026 to October 15, 2026GovWareSands Expo and Convention Centre, Singapore, Singapore · attends
October 24, 2026 to October 28, 2026ISC2 Security CongressGaylord Rockies Resort & Convention Center, Aurora, United States · attends
November 17, 2026 to November 20, 2026Microsoft IgniteMoscone Center, San Francisco, United States · attends
November 19, 2026ISC2 SECURE LondonLondon, U.K. · attends
November 30, 2026 to December 4, 2026AWS re:InventLas Vegas, United States · attends
December 7, 2026 to December 9, 2026Gartner Identity & Access Management SummitLas Vegas, United States · attends
December 7, 2026 to December 10, 2026Black Hat EuropeExCeL, London, U.K. · attends
December 14, 2026 to December 19, 2026SANS Cyber Defense InitiativeGrand Hyatt Washington, Washington, United States · attends

Last twelve months

September 28, 2026NYC Security Leadership SummitMidtown Manhattan, New York City, United States · took part
September 22, 2026 to September 24, 2026Gartner Security & Risk Management SummitExCeL, London, U.K. · attended

As the event pages on underdefense.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page underdefense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (43); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Agentic AI SOC & Compliance Automation Platform
underdefense.com
For: IT leaders and teams
underdefense.com
Price stated: Get a custom quote underdefense.com/pricing
Starting price: 11 underdefense.com/platform
Free plan or trial: Try it Free underdefense.com
Integrations claimed: 100 underdefense.com · 250 underdefense.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications: ISO 27001 CertifiedSOC 2 Type II CompliantISO 27001SOC 2GDPR
Hosting: EU/US
Customers named: Invicti Securityarchaea.energy

What UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: underdefense.com, underdefense.com/pricing, trust.underdefense.com, underdefense.com/platform, underdefense.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.