Every category where a model named Arctic Wolf for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SIEM platforms	Security operations	2%	10 of 61	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI SOC agents	Security operations	0%	42 of 104	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%
Endpoint detection and response	Security operations	0%	17 of 55	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 30%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Network detection and response	Security operations	0%	42 of 102	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%
Extended detection and response	Security operations	0%	31 of 58	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Identity threat detection and response	Identity and access	0%	47 of 105	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51%
Vulnerability management platforms	Security operations	0%	69 of 77	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Arctic Wolf held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · SIEM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 20 of 71

Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 19 → 10 of 55

EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
SIEM	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 19 → 10 of 61
AI SOC agents	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 42 of 104, unchanged
EDR	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 30 → 17 of 55
NDR	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 42 of 102, unchanged
XDR	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 31 of 58, unchanged
ITDR	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 47 of 105, unchanged
Vuln management	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 18 → 69 of 77

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Arctic Wolf across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative11 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Arctic Wolf: A market leader in managed security operations. They hook up to your existing tools, ingest your logs, and act as your 24/7 outsourced SOC team.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · scale prompt · first choice

“Full outsourcing | Custom (SaaS + sensors) | 15x faster resolution, 10-day deploy” Grok 4.20 · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · alternative

“Heterogeneous environment | SentinelOne, Arctic Wolf, or open XDR” Kimi K2 · XDR · scale prompt · alternative

“Managed/SMB: Huntress or Arctic Wolf.” Grok 4.20 · ITDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steep learning curve; slow support; complex integrations/ticketing; visibility delays.” Grok 4.20 · Vuln management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Arctic Wolf, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Arctic Wolf was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SentinelOne Singularity11 of 405Not among the top eight

Huntress Managed EDR10 of 401Not among the top eight

Darktrace8 of 400Not among the top eight

Microsoft Sentinel7 of 400Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Cloud6 of 403Not among the top eight

Dropzone AI6 of 402Not among the top eight

Vectra AI6 of 400Not among the top eight

UnderDefense5 of 402Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Falcon5 of 401Not among the top eight

Huntress5 of 401Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Arctic Wolf. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named Arctic Wolf and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

underdefense.com23

resources.rework.com13

g2.com12

huntress.com10

securityboulevard.com10

sentinelone.com9

techrepublic.com9

acronis.com8

checkthat.ai8

expertinsights.com8

110 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming Arctic Wolf came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-smb15

underdefense.com/blog/most-affordable-ai-soc-platforms9

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-tools/best-ai-tools-for-cybersecurity-20268

underdefense.com/blog/best-ai-soc-providers8

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-agents/best-ai-agents-for-cybersecurity-20267

swimlane.com/blog/best-ai-soc-platforms7

techrepublic.com/article/best-ai-security-tools7

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-security-operations-center-solutions6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

arcticwolf.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Arctic Wolf takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Sentinel takes 38%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “siem platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “siem platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 49,500 a month (“arctic wolf”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,342 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 40,780 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,999 · 366 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 9,832
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 0 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 87 text, 26 image, 7 video · 56 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2022, as Arctic Wolf Networks Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 40 in the year, 80 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 61 in SIEM

Segment leader

38%

Microsoft Sentinel

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 40 answers
Its own site cited: in 40 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on arcticwolf.com

4,176

subdomains included

Content

1,642

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,950

Product · Integration

52 · 11

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,240	60	2026-09-25	MDR, XDR
News or press	245	8	2026-09-15	MDR, EDR
Glossary or explainer	119	0	2026-04-17	EDR, Endpoint protection
Template or tool	12	0	2022-07-14
Conference or event	9	0	2026-06-30
Podcast or video	9	0	2024-01-24
Webinar or virtual event	3	0	2026-04-09
Comparison	3	undated		MDR, EDR
Case study	1	0	2026-04-08
Report or ebook	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-25How aurora agentic soc is building next generation of soc analysts blog
2026-09-25How the aurora agentic soc is building the next generation of soc analysts blog
2026-09-24Psychedelic stealer fake clickfix captcha targets ukraine blog
2026-09-17Engineered for trust how we built the ai trust engine blog
2026-09-17Your security team is stretched thin can ai return the hours blog
2026-09-15Arctic wolf launches aurora mdr connect news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page arcticwolf.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name MDR (37); 24 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Arctic Wolf

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Arctic Wolf is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Leaders in Security Operations
arcticwolf.com
For: security teams
arcticwolf.com
Price stated: Flat, predictable pricing with no additional token costs. arcticwolf.com
Integrations claimed: 250 arcticwolf.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001SOC 2 Type ISIGTX-RAMP
Customers named: BWT Alpine Formula One TeamBethesda Health Group
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Arctic Wolf's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: arcticwolf.com, trust.arcticwolf.com, arcticwolf.com/solutions, arcticwolf.com/customers, arcticwolf.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arctic Wolf's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arctic Wolf, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Arctic Wolf by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Arctic Wolf is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Arctic Wolf, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.