Every category where a model named Radiant Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI SOC agents	Security operations	24%	2 of 104	3%	29	accepted challenger
AI security platforms	Security operations	2%	16 of 233	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
SOAR platforms	Security operations	0%	22 of 67	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Radiant Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Radiant Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	3	0	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	2	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	2	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct20 labels11

Paraphrase14 labels3

Comparative16 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for mid-market alert overload, effectively addressing the core pain point of too many alerts and not enough analysts” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · first choice

“Radiant Security is praised for mid-market teams looking to reduce SIEM costs and alert noise.” Mistral Small · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · first choice

“Start with Dropzone AI, Prophet Security, or Radiant Security if building in-house capability” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · first choice

“If I had to choose one for a company with a tight budget, I'd start with Radiant Security” Perplexity Sonar · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Radiant is likely no longer a viable standalone choice for a typical mid-sized B2B stack.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SOC agents · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Radiant Security, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Radiant Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dropzone AI45 of 6316Compare →

Prophet Security29 of 632Compare →

Torq23 of 632Compare →

Intezer AI SOC21 of 630Compare →

Microsoft Security Copilot15 of 630Compare →

SentinelOne Purple AI14 of 631Compare →

UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC12 of 636Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Charlotte AI12 of 630Not among the top eight

Huntress Managed EDR11 of 632Not among the top eight

UnderDefense9 of 631Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Radiant Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named Radiant Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

underdefense.com52

intezer.com40

swimlane.com34

resources.rework.com31

d3security.com29

securityboulevard.com20

panther.com19

dropzone.ai18

github.com18

startupstash.com18

279 of the 279 domain citations in answers naming Radiant Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

swimlane.com/blog/best-ai-soc-platforms31

underdefense.com/blog/most-affordable-ai-soc-platforms26

intezer.com/blog/top-15-ai-soc-platforms-in-202625

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-agents/best-ai-agents-for-cybersecurity-202624

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-mid-market24

underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-smb21

d3security.com/blog/best-agentic-soc-platforms17

intezer.com/guides/ai-soc/mid-sized-enterprises17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

radiantsecurity.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Radiant Security takes 24% of first choices and Dropzone AI takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai soc agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai soc agents”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“radiant security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 13 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,415 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 539 · 12 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 700
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

10 ads · 7 text, 2 image, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2026, as David Beauchamp, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 10 in the year. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

24%

rank 2 of 104 in AI SOC agents

Segment leader

24%

Dropzone AI

First choices: 16 across its categories
Named in: 63 answers
Its own site cited: in 63 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on radiantsecurity.ai

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page radiantsecurity.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Radiant Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Radiant Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Radiant Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Radiant Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Radiant Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Radiant Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Radiant Security is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Radiant Security is among the products AI models recommend first in AI SOC agents this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/ai-soc-agents/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/radiant-security--ai-soc-agents-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI SOC agents, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI SOC agents standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/ai-soc-agents/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/radiant-security--ai-soc-agents-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI SOC agents, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI SOC agents standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/ai-soc-agents/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/radiant-security--ai-soc-agents-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI SOC agents, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI SOC agents standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.