Index › Products › SPIRE · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SPIRE

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SPIRE was named 2 times in NHI management, where JumpCloud led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business70 of 125

under the label threshold

Mid-market37 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In nhi management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SPIRE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Non-human identity management	Identity and access	0%	37 of 128	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SPIRE yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SPIRE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Free, Kubernetes-focused for workload identities (SVO proofs). Best if you're in containers/microservices” Grok 4.1 Fast · NHI management · budget prompt · alternative

“consider SPIRE for issuing workload identities, paired with OpenBao for secrets” GPT-6 Luna · NHI management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SPIRE, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SPIRE was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OpenBao2 of 30Not among the top eight

Aembit1 of 31Not among the top eight

Doppler1 of 31Not among the top eight

HashiCorp Vault1 of 31Not among the top eight

AWS Secrets Manager1 of 30Not among the top eight

Akeyless1 of 30Not among the top eight

CyberArk Identity Security Platform1 of 30Not among the top eight

Entro Security1 of 30Not among the top eight

SailPoint1 of 30Not among the top eight

cert-manager1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SPIRE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named SPIRE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aembit.io1

aimultiple.com1

almcorp.com1

cybersecmanager.net1

cybersecuritynews.com1

decryptiondigest.com1

developer.hashicorp.com1

expertinsights.com1

g2.com1

github.com1

No domain is on file for SPIRE, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

aembit.io/pricing1

aimultiple.com/pam-solutions1

almcorp.com/blog/best-identity-and-access-management-tools1

cybersecmanager.net/best-non-human-identity-management-platforms1

cybersecuritynews.com/best-secrets-management-tools/amp1

decryptiondigest.com/blog/non-human-identity-security-guide1

developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs1

developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/concepts/cloud-access-management1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SPIRE

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SPIRE; a claim can dispute any of them.

SPIRE/SPIFFE 1

Follow SPIRE

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SPIRE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SPIRE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SPIRE by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SPIRE is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SPIRE, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.