Every category where a model named Spendbase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SaaS management platforms	IT operations and endpoint	2%	13 of 64	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Torii at 34%
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	2%	30 of 159	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
Cloud cost management	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	68 of 76	40%	5	under 10 labels · led by Vantage at 45%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spendbase yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spendbase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	0	2
Grok 4.20	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most small businesses, Spendbase (free plan) or QuickBooks (low-cost, easy to use) are the best starting points.” Mistral Small · IT financial mgmt · budget prompt · first choice

“the best fit in the results is Spendbase because it has a free tier” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS management · budget prompt · first choice

“Spendbase is ideal if you want a free tier with basic tracking capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS management · budget prompt · alternative

“Best if you want SaaS + cloud spend together: Spendbase is highlighted” Perplexity Sonar · FinOps · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Recent Trustpilot feedback for Spendbase mentions no phone number, live chat that ignores messages, and unresponsive account management.” GPT-5.4 mini · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative

“Spendbase lacks key features like a mobile app and advanced reporting, along with limited dashboard customization” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spendbase, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendbase was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vantage5 of 182Not among the top eight

Torii4 of 183Not among the top eight

CloudZero4 of 181Not among the top eight

Zluri4 of 181Not among the top eight

IBM Apptio Cloudability4 of 180Not among the top eight

SpendHound3 of 182Not among the top eight

AWS Cost Explorer3 of 181Not among the top eight

Microsoft Cost Management3 of 181Not among the top eight

Zylo3 of 181Not among the top eight

CAST AI3 of 180Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spendbase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Spendbase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

corma.io8

g2.com8

learn.g2.com7

sourceforge.net6

cloudeagle.ai5

josys.com5

amnic.com4

cloudaware.com4

cloudzero.com4

geekflare.com4

Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Spendbase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

corma.io/blog/best-saas-management-platforms-for-small-and-mid-size-companies-in-20265

corma.io/blog/top-15-saas-management-solutions-for-mid-sized-companies5

cloudeagle.ai/blogs/best-saas-management-platforms4

cloudzero.com/blog/cloud-cost-management-tools4

g2.com/categories/cloud-cost-management/small-business4

learn.g2.com/best-cloud-cost-management-software4

amnic.com/blogs/cloud-cost-management-tools3

cloudaware.com/blog/cloud-cost-management-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on spendbase.co

420

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	17	2	2026-07-20
Comparison	15	0	2025-02-26
Case study	12	2	2026-07-13
News or press	8	0	2026-03-04

Most recent

2026-07-20How to activate your physical card blog
2026-07-13Case study grace ai case study
2026-07-13Case study exvirience case study
2026-07-02Payment account terms conditions eu uk blog
2026-06-29Payment account eu uk fees and limits blog
2026-06-26Sales executive for llm api blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page spendbase.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Spendbase

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Spendbase is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Digital Banking & Virtual Cards by Spendbase
spendbase.co
For: eligible business customers; Non-EU residents; tech startups
spendbase.co
Price stated: Get your digital banking services for free spendbase.co
Starting price: 0 spendbase.co/pricing
Free plan or trial: free spendbase.co
Certifications: ISO CertifiedGDPR CompliantCCPA CompliantPCI CertifiedSOC2 CompliantSOC 2 type IIISO27001PCI DSS
Hosting: AWS cloudeurope-west1
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, customers

What Spendbase's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: spendbase.co, spendbase.co/pricing, trust.spendbase.co. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spendbase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spendbase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spendbase by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Spendbase is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spendbase, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.