| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 10% | 2 of 79 | 10% | 41 | accepted challenger |
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 30 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Site24x7 at 24% |
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 0% | 42 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LiteLLM at 38% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your primary goal is to understand your margins, assign cloud costs to specific customers (tenants), and align engineering with finance, CloudZero is highly recommended.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FinOps · direct prompt · first choice
“CloudZero is the strongest platform for organizations that need to connect cloud and AI spend to business outcomes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FinOps · comparative prompt · first choice
“CloudZero and Economize are the top choices due to their focus on actionable insights and scalability” Mistral Small · FinOps · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose CloudZero if your primary goal is to calculate your gross margins and track cost-per-customer” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FinOps · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid expensive enterprise FinOps platforms (like CloudZero, which can run $2,000+/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FinOps · budget prompt · hard negative
“Steep learning curve, confusing setup, dashboard issues... Not ideal for beginners or simple needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Complex setup requiring significant implementation effort ... Steep learning curve” Kimi K2 · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“However, it's enterprise-only pricing without a self-serve option.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FinOps · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 117 answers that named CloudZero and are not a share of its labels.
381 of the 471 domain citations in answers naming CloudZero came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudZero's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudZero, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudzero.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.