AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › SpendHound · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SpendHound

33Judge labels
11First choices
0Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in SaaS management for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 64 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In saas management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SpendHound for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS management platformsIT operations and endpoint12%3 of 640%8under 10 labels · led by Torii at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SpendHound yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SpendHound across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels10
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have fewer than 1,000 employees and want automated tracking, renewal alerts, and price benchmarks with zero budget: Go with SpendHound.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most budget-conscious approach, SpendHound stands out because it's completely free for companies with fewer than 1,000 employees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS management · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need truly zero cost today and <1,000 employees, SpendHound free or Corma’s free plan are the lowest risk starts.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SaaS management · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with SpendHound if you're under 1,000 employees - it's completely free and provides enterprise-grade features.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SpendHound, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SpendHound was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Torii15 of 333Not among the top eight
BetterCloud15 of 330Not among the top eight
Zylo14 of 331Not among the top eight
Cledara13 of 331Not among the top eight
Zluri11 of 331Not among the top eight
Corma9 of 331Not among the top eight
Substly6 of 332Not among the top eight
NachoNacho6 of 331Not among the top eight
Ramp6 of 330Not among the top eight
Vertice5 of 332Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SpendHound. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named SpendHound and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spendhound.comYour site22
cloudeagle.ai17
corma.io17
g2.com14
learn.g2.com12
josys.com10
resources.rework.com9
zylo.com9
cloudnuro.ai8
peoplemanagingpeople.com8

104 of the 126 domain citations in answers naming SpendHound came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

spendhound.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SpendHound takes 12% of first choices and Torii takes 34%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “saas management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “saas management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
880 a month (“spendhound”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,468 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,419 · 49 in the top three
Sites linking to it
654
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
25 ads · 22 text, 2 video, 1 image · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2024, as Thomas Ruello, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 23 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
12%
rank 3 of 64 in saas management
Segment leader
34%
Torii
First choices
11 across its categories
Named in
33 answers
Its own site cited
in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on spendhound.com
650
subdomains included
Content
111
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
15 · 467
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog5102026-04-17
Case study29undated
Conference or event1202026-03-24
Comparison9undated
Webinar or virtual event5undated
Podcast or video2undated
Report or ebook1undated
Template or tool1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page spendhound.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow SpendHound

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SpendHound is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
SaaS Spend Management & Pricing Benchmarks
For
finance, ops, and procurement teams
Price stated
0 spendhound.com
Starting price
0 spendhound.com
Free plan or trial
100% free spendhound.com
Certifications
SOC 2 complianceSOC 2 Type 2GDPR
Hosting
USA
Customers named
KitBenepassFusion92Design PickleFinite StateLeapBlockdaemonDecked
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What SpendHound's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: spendhound.com, spendhound.com/pricing, trust.spendhound.com, spendhound.com/platform, spendhound.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SpendHound's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SpendHound, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SpendHound by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SpendHound is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SpendHound, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at spendhound.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where SpendHound is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

SpendHound is among the products AI models recommend first in SaaS management platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in SaaS management platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/saas-management-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/spendhound--saas-management-platforms-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in SaaS management platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS management platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in SaaS management platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/saas-management-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/spendhound--saas-management-platforms-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in SaaS management platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS management platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in SaaS management platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/operations/saas-management-platforms/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/spendhound--saas-management-platforms-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in SaaS management platforms, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS management platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.