| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network detection and response | Security operations | 16% | 3 of 102 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21% | |
| SIEM platforms | Security operations | 0% | 16 of 61 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| OT and IoT security | Security operations | 0% | 50 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best NDR (Network Detection and Response) platform is Security Onion, a free and open-source solution that's frequently recommended as the top starting point” Grok 4.20 · NDR · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have in-house technical expertise and want near-zero software cost, Security Onion delivers enterprise-grade NDR capabilities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NDR · budget prompt · first choice
“the best NDR choice is usually Security Onion if you can handle some setup and maintenance yourself, because it is free” Perplexity Sonar · NDR · budget prompt · first choice
“For true zero license cost: Security Onion (DIY) or Zeek/Suricata with a separate analytics platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NDR · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid these platforms if you have a small, overworked IT or security team.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SIEM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 48 answers that named Security Onion and are not a share of its labels.
222 of the 222 domain citations in answers naming Security Onion came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,585 | 7 | 2026-09-11 | Logs | |
| Conference or event | 41 | 0 | 2026-05-18 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2012-01-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2020-05-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on securityonion.net state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page securityonion.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Security Onion's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: securityonion.net. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Security Onion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Security Onion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Security Onion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Security Onion is among the products AI models recommend first in Network detection and response this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.