AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › SCA › Trivy vs Snyk Open Source
Software composition analysis · October 2026 Edition

Trivy vs Snyk Open Source

Zero of fourteen models named Trivy first on the direct prompt; seven named Snyk Open Source. Trivy was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Snyk Open Source by fourteen and Trivy carries 27 labels and Snyk Open Source 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Trivy

endorsed leader

Named in eight categories this edition.

Snyk Open Source

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share31%16%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2755A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Trivy reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Mend.io was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Trivy vs Mend.io · Trivy vs OWASP Dependency-Track · Trivy vs OWASP Dependency-Check

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the software composition analysis page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TrivyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSnyk Open Source
Direct07
Paraphrase901 against Trivy · 3 against Snyk Open Source
Comparative07
Budget-constrained701 against Snyk Open Source
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against Trivy · 5 against Snyk Open Source
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Trivy and Snyk Open Source were named in the same answer fifty-eight times, of the 224 answers naming Trivy and the 177 naming Snyk Open Source. In those answers Snyk Open Source took the first choice seventeen times and Trivy eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Trivy and Snyk Open Source stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Trivy Snyk Open Source first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Trivy on the left and Snyk Open Source on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Trivy and Snyk Open Source stood in it.

Snyk Open Source first, Trivy an alternative

7 of 14 modelsTrivy was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniSnyk Open Source alternatives: FOSSA, OWASP Dependency-Check, OWASP Dependency-Track
Grok 4.20Snyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
DeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Open Source alternatives: Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
Kimi K2Mend.io, Snyk Open Source alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, GitHub Dependabot, Sonatype Lifecycle, Trivy
GLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Open Source alternatives: Black Duck, Endor Labs, FOSSA, Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle
MiniMax M2.5Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle alternatives: Black Duck, FOSSA, GitHub Advanced Security
GPT-6 LunaSnyk Open Source alternatives: GitHub's built-in supply-chain tools, Mend.io, Sonatype Lifecycle

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mend.io alternatives: Black Duck, Endor Labs, FOSSA, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle
Gemini 3.5 FlashAikido Security alternatives: Endor Labs, Mend.io, Snyk Open Source
Perplexity SonarMend.io alternatives: Black Duck, Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle
Qwen 3.7 FlashMend.io alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Snyk Open Source
Muse Glimmer 30BMend.io alternatives: Snyk Open Source, Sonatype Lifecycle

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallMend.io alternatives: GitHub Advanced Security, Insignary Clarity
Llama 4 MaverickMend.io

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Snyk Open Source leads by twenty-one points.
Snyk Open Source39%#1 of 14
Trivy18%#2 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Trivy leads at mid-market.
Trivy31%#1 of 17
Snyk Open Source16%#2 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Trivy leads by four points.
Trivy9%#4 of 14
Snyk Open Source5%#5 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Trivy

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“free options like Trivy being the best zero-budget choice but typically requiring more tuning than commercial offerings” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Trivy disclosed a 2026 compromise involving a malicious release and GitHub Action tags, so pin and verify the tooling” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Trivy (from Aqua Security) as the top open-source dependency vulnerability scanner for a mid-sized B2B company.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Snyk Open Source

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“enterprise buyers often cite "unpredictable ballooning costs"... some procurement models recommend avoiding it if strict cost-prediction budgets are required” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Snyk is proprietary software. A mid-sized B2B company might prefer Trivy or Dependency-Check to avoid vendor lock-in and licensing costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“limited policy flexibility, poor data quality for complex remediations, high false positives in transitives, and costs spike” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Snyk if you want a seamless developer experience with early vulnerability detection and integrated security scanning.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Snyk if you have a budget and want the best developer-first integration and workflow tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Snyk for most mid-market B2B due to its balance, high adoption, and dev-centric design” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.