Snyk Open Source vs GitHub Advanced Security
Seven of fourteen models named Snyk Open Source first on the direct prompt; one named GitHub Advanced Security. Snyk Open Source was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and GitHub Advanced Security by eleven and Snyk Open Source carries 55 labels and GitHub Advanced Security 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the software composition analysis page.
By framing
Snyk Open SourceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitHub Advanced Security
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Snyk Open Source and GitHub Advanced Security were named in the same answer fifty-eight times, of the 177 answers naming Snyk Open Source and the 125 naming GitHub Advanced Security. In those answers GitHub Advanced Security took the first choice two times and Snyk Open Source twenty-three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Snyk Open Source GitHub Advanced Security first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Snyk Open Source on the left and GitHub Advanced Security on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Snyk Open Source first, GitHub Advanced Security an alternative
6 of 14 modelsGitHub Advanced Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Snyk Open Source39%#1 of 14GitHub Advanced Security2%#8 of 14Snyk Open Source16%#2 of 17GitHub Advanced Security2%#8 of 17Snyk Open Source5%#5 of 14GitHub Advanced Security4%#9 of 14What the models said about Snyk Open Source
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“enterprise buyers often cite "unpredictable ballooning costs"... some procurement models recommend avoiding it if strict cost-prediction budgets are required” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Snyk is proprietary software. A mid-sized B2B company might prefer Trivy or Dependency-Check to avoid vendor lock-in and licensing costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“limited policy flexibility, poor data quality for complex remediations, high false positives in transitives, and costs spike” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Snyk if you want a seamless developer experience with early vulnerability detection and integrated security scanning.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Snyk if you have a budget and want the best developer-first integration and workflow tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Snyk for most mid-market B2B due to its balance, high adoption, and dev-centric design” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about GitHub Advanced Security
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“GHAS is expensive and is sold as a bundled suite. If you only want SCA, paying for the entire suite might not make financial sense.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“For GitHub\u2011centric teams: Start with GitHub Advanced Security” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Dependabot SCA + secret/code scanning from ~$19/user/mo (free for public repos). Native if your workflow is GitHub-centric.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.