IT AI Index

Index › Products › Silverfort · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Silverfort

14Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Silverfort was named 7 times in NHI management and 1 other category, where JumpCloud led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market32 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 96

under the label threshold

In nhi management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Silverfort for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Non-human identity management	Identity and access	0%	32 of 128	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14%
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	16 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 47%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Silverfort yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Silverfort across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are securing on-prem environments and preventing lateral ransomware movement, look at Silverfort.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · NHI management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Go with Silverfort if: Your biggest security gaps are not SaaS applications, but internal domain administration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Legacy apps and service accounts that can't adopt modern protocols? → Silverfort” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative

“Unified platform for human AND non-human identities across all environments” Kimi K2 · NHI management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Silverfort, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Silverfort was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cisco Duo8 of 142Not among the top eight

Okta Verify7 of 140Not among the top eight

Microsoft Entra ID6 of 146Not among the top eight

Oasis Security5 of 142Not among the top eight

Akeyless5 of 140Not among the top eight

Astrix Security5 of 140Not among the top eight

HashiCorp Vault5 of 140Not among the top eight

Ping Identity5 of 140Not among the top eight

YubiKey5 of 140Not among the top eight

CyberArk Identity Security Platform3 of 143Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Silverfort. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Silverfort and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

silverfort.comYour site7

cybersecuritynews.com6

securityboulevard.com6

startwithidentity.com6

expertinsights.com5

gbhackers.com5

miniorange.com5

aimultiple.com4

akeyless.io4

gartner.com4

Forty-five of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Silverfort came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

akeyless.io/blog/top-5-non-human-identity-management-tools-for-20264

gbhackers.com/best-mfa-compared4

miniorange.com/blog/mfa-providers4

oloid.com/blog/multi-factor-authentication-solutions4

cybersecuritynews.com/best-mfa-solutions-20263

cybersecuritynews.com/best-mfa-solutions-2026/amp3

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-nhi-management-solutions3

frontegg.com/guides/multi-factor-authentication-solutions3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

silverfort.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Silverfort takes 0% of first choices and JumpCloud takes 14%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “non-human identity management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best non-human identity management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 15,992 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,628 · 169 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,672
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 71 text, 37 image, 12 video · 49 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2023, as Silverfort LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 65 in the year, 55 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 32 of 128 in NHI management

Segment leader

14%

JumpCloud

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: in 14 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on silverfort.com

909

subdomains included

Content

767

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

76 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	532	43	2026-09-25	MFA, PAM
News or press	100	0	2026-06-08	MFA, PAM
Glossary or explainer	68	1	2026-08-05	MFA, IGA
Case study	19	1	2026-07-24	MFA
Report or ebook	18	0	2026-01-24	MFA
Webinar or virtual event	14	0	2026-06-01
Template or tool	5	1	2026-07-30	MFA
Conference or event	4	0	2026-04-02
Comparison	4	2	2026-07-28	MFA, PAM
Podcast or video	3	0	2026-05-20

Most recent

2026-09-25Silverfort integration with anthropic compliance api blog
2026-09-24Replicating part of the openai attack on hugging face blog
2026-09-21Runtime is where ai agent security gets real new research unpacks the arise framework blog
2026-09-16Silverfort and sentinelone risk based policy escalation blog
2026-09-11Papercut breach what ai agent attacks teach us about identity security resilience blog
2026-09-10Ai agent intent explained blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page silverfort.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Silverfort

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Silverfort is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Runtime Identity Security for AI, AD & Cloud
silverfort.com
For: identity and security teams
silverfort.com
Price stated: Contact us for a quote. silverfort.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: AD Security Assessment ... Start Free silverfort.com
Certifications: CCPACPRAEU-US DPFGDPRISO/IEC 27001:2022Microsoft SSPANIST CSFSOC 2
Hosting: East-USWest-USGermany- WestFrance-CentralWest Europe (Netherlands)UK-SouthSoutheast-Asia (Singapore)Australia-East
Customers named: KayakWomble Bond DickinsonAgilisysAgodaPayoneerUPSSingtelAirbus
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations

What Silverfort's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: silverfort.com, silverfort.com/pricing, trust.silverfort.com, silverfort.com/platform, silverfort.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Silverfort's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Silverfort, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Silverfort by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Silverfort is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Silverfort, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.